Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Philosopher who wrote (6481)	3/11/2004 8:19:14 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

Right. Bush tax policy rewards the already-rich and ide rich versus those who actually have to work. It's not fair and it's not right. It sets a bad example.

To: The Philosopher who wrote (6481)	3/11/2004 8:23:24 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

no it isn't fair and I'm sure its about to change (fica tax), not because "the little guy" who is being screwed in this sitation finally got a voice, but because state governments especially California can't handle the earned income revenue collapse that has occurred these past few years due to wage deflation and the whole system is up for a massive reworking if dems are elected imho. California recently ruled that software companies doing work offshore have to pay CA taxes on 100% of their product, not just what is produced in CA. Thats a massive shift to the tax code, something radical (almost a tariff) and this would have never flown in the Clinton era. Now that federal and state budgets are coming in way under plan its a new era in taxes.