Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E. T. who wrote (25708)	3/13/2004 9:14:33 AM
From: rrufff	Respond to of 25898

You have it exactly right. H for Hitler knows one thing. He needs to justify his hatred. He will make up stuff and, even better, "cut and paste" from web blogs to support his hatred. It doesn't matter how intellectually dishonest his theories are. If he can say it enough times, he hopes it creates a trail of precedent, that other Hitlers will follow.

To: E. T. who wrote (25708)	3/14/2004 2:55:46 AM
From: Thomas M.	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 25898

You are saying that whatever it was Israel did justifies the PA's use of terror tactics Um, no. You said, "Israel showed good faith in 2000." Right in the middle of the 2000 negotiations, Israel sent a famous mass murderer or Palestinians into a Muslim holy area, and the next day Israeli troops killed unarmed demonstrators. This was the start of the violence. According to you, these were acts of "good faith". I disagree. I think the opposite is true. This was an attempt to sabotage the peace talks. If Arafat had sent a member of the Hamas military wing to the Wailing Wall with 1000 Hamas gunmen, and then the next day the gunmen had fired on unarmed Israeli demonstrators, would you consider that an act of "good faith"? Tom