Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (34850)	3/16/2004 9:49:24 AM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793637

it logically follows that the fault is Bush's for twisting the arms of all these lukewarm supporters just so he could counter the claims of unilateralism It seems to me that the above statement is logical. Chilling, but logical. I would counter by suggesting that it's really the fault of France for threatening to veto any UN resolution for the use of force against Iraq. Also logical. But then, would it not also be true that it was all the UN's fault to begin with, for sanctioning Saddam, but failing to take decisive action?

To: Lane3 who wrote (34850)	3/16/2004 9:57:27 AM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793637

Hitchens yesterday used the same logic you're using, only he was joking. He thought. Message 19920134 I can't tell whether you're joking, yourself, or serious, that the bombing in Spain is Bush's fault. I hope joking.