SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tejek who wrote (185023)3/17/2004 3:52:40 PM
From: Alighieri  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1578012
 
Is their organizational structure and MO the same as al Qaeda? No. That's the key when determining how to eradicate them. With the Taliban, we could go in all guns blazing. That approach has worked to a good degree because they were mostly above ground. Of course, now they too have gone underground and are harder to nail.

It doesn't work with al Qaeda because they are mostly like an iceberg loosely connected to other icebergs. With them, we have to go underground to find them. For some reason, we balk at that approach.

That's too bad because we will be forever on the short end of the stick until we deal with them mano a mano. Once again its that black and white issue....one size fits all. Its a very neocon American attitude.


Gosh Ted, I don't know...I am just not sure you can slice the bologna this thin. These were pretty nasty people, not so unlike AQ, who gave sanctuary to AQ and probably contributed to the ranks of AQ. I am not sure we have the luxury of psychoanalyzing them before we bomb the $hit out of them, after a 9/11 event and ample warnings to cooperate. I definitely agree that Iraq took the eye of the US off the ball, if that is the point. I may be missing some subtle other point here...

Al