SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (35333)3/18/2004 2:08:15 PM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793670
 
The Bush administration never took the position that Saddam was responsible for 9/11. The position, which is completely consistent with the position taken by the former Clinton administration, was that Saddam was a state sponsor of terrorism.

From a pre-war BBC report: "American claims of a link between Iraq and al-Qaeda rest heavily on reports that a Jordanian al-Qaeda associate, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, has been given a safe haven in Iraq."
news.bbc.co.uk

Which happens to be true. Zarqawi, who is the third most powerful member of Al Qaeda, was given a safe haven in Iraq. If bin Laden is dead, then Zaraqawi is the second most powerful member of Al Qaeda. And he's definitely been behind some recent attacks on US interests, such as the assassination of USAID representative Lawrence Foley.

I posted just a bit upstream about Saddam's support for the Mujahideed e-Khalq, Abu Abbas, and the PLO. I should also mention his support for Ansar al-Islam, closely linked to the Taliban and bin Laden.
csmonitor.com

If you actually read what bin Laden said about the US, you should remember that he was angry at the US because the US enforced the UN sanctions, which Saddam used as an excuse to starve his own citizens.

So to argue that Al Qaeda only became interested in Iraq because of the recent war demonstrates either either a lack of knowledge or a lack of understanding.



To: Lane3 who wrote (35333)3/18/2004 6:13:30 PM
From: Ann Corrigan  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793670
 
kholt,
You've heard far too many Kerry campaign speeches. Your post reminds me of his habit of trying to have everything both ways. When he gets back on campaign trail, I'm sure he'll waffle as usual on the liberal insistence that al Qaida had absolutely no connection to Iraq.

I'm sure al Qaida would have avoided taking credit for Spanish massacre, if they realized that it would have helped elect John Kerry.