SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mike McFarland who wrote (10624)3/22/2004 6:38:51 AM
From: Square_Dealings  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 110194
 
<A single unit of hydrate, when heated and depressurized, can release 160 times its volume in gas.>

I think you've found the answer!
substitute "Ten Year Note" for "singe unit of hydrate"

g>.

M



To: Mike McFarland who wrote (10624)3/22/2004 8:27:30 AM
From: Haim R. Branisteanu  Respond to of 110194
 
Mike, as to land stability the same can be said about any other underground NG reserves or crude oil.

My point was that the benefits are huge if enough R&D is performed to utilize those energy reservoirs adequately.

from the link you posted

In 1995, the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) completed a systematic appraisal of the in-place natural gas hydrate resources of the United States, both onshore and offshore. The mean (expected value) is estimated to be 320,000 trillion cubic feet of gas. This assessment did not address the problem of hydrate recovery. Subsequent refinements of the data in 1997, using information from the Ocean Drilling Program, have suggested that the mean should be adjusted slightly downward, to around 200,000 trillion cubic feet. For comparison, the estimated conventional gas resources and reserves in the United States are 1,400 trillion cubic feet. If it could be safely and economically recovered, one 50 by 150 kilometer area off the coast of North and South Carolina is estimated to hold enough methane to supply the needs of the United States for over 70 years.



To: Mike McFarland who wrote (10624)3/22/2004 10:42:28 AM
From: yard_man  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 110194
 
besides escape (no small matter, if you believe the climatologists -- but I am not sure I do),

I take it there are significant hurdles to extraction --

Haim, completely missed my point which was:
From purely an energy standpoint -- it is possible that the energy required to keep it stable and extract it is greater than the energy you get out ...