Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (127231)	3/23/2004 5:34:31 PM
From: GST	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 281500

<I consider someone who shoots a murderer to be a murderer, for purposes of law, but in my mind, his offense is not against justice, per se, but against the rule of law.> Murder is murder. There is no justice in murder. That is why we call it murder. Murder is unjust killing. There are forms of justified killing -- for example self-defense. If you kill somebody in self-defense it is not murder. There is also justified execution -- justified execution occurs after a trial. Execution without a trial is murder. What Israel did was murder. They murdered an old man in a wheel chair whom they absolutely hate. It was a high-tech execution without a trial -- murder. They murdered somebody they called a murderer -- Israel is no better than the people they are murdering. The killing will go on, and on. Murder to justify more murder, to be answered by more murder. There is no justice to be found in this murder -- only blood, hatred and more murder.