Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (185605)	3/26/2004 10:47:43 PM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1586967

Ted, re: on CNBC, Powell refuses to condemn Clarke. I think their strategy is changing. Clarke hit 'em where it hurts; the essence of their pitch is terror security. And Clarke is GOOD, he took their best and threw it back in their face. Even Rice is backing off. But they will keep digging to find something to nail Clarke. That's what Frist is doing. Right now, I think they are trying to cut their losses; it dawned on them they look like idiots. Every comment digs a deeper hole. Thank God for people of principle like Clarke. John

To: tejek who wrote (185605)	3/27/2004 5:29:33 AM
From: boris_a	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1586967

the attacks by Frist and the loyal faithful In the initial AP press release, theres was the following statement: "Frist disclosed the effort to declassify Clarke's testimony in remarks on the Senate floor, then talked with reporter. He said he personally didn't know whether there were any discrepancies between Clarke's two appearances." After 60 minutes, this part was gone. From the UK: news.independent.co.uk "... the increasingly dark forebodings of the intelligence community failed to resonate. The preliminary report of the commission notes the "tension" felt by John McLaughlin, the deputy director of the CIA, between the understandable wish of a new administration to get its own take on an issue, and the URGENCY of the situation on the ground. The sudden spike in intercepted "chatter" suggesting one or more impending terrorist strikes went unheeded or was DONWNPLAYED because of the assumption they would be abroad. In May, according to private testimony from Ms Rice, Mr Bush expressed frustration as George Tenet, the CIA director, warned again of terrorist threats in his daily briefing. By July, so nervous were intelligence specialists that two unidentified CIA officers dealing with al-Qa'ida contemplated resignation in order to go public with their FEARS. But, by the end of July, the "chatter" had subsided. Wrongly, Mr Tenet concluded that any attacks had been POSTPONED. Mr Clarke was so upset his advice was not being followed that he prepared to ask for a new post. In June, a new presidential draft on ambitious covert action against al-Qa'ida was circulating. But nothing happened. The next, and penultimate, key date is 6 August 2001. That day Mr Bush, on holiday at his Texas ranch, received his top-secret "President's Daily Briefing", or PDB. The document contained the CIA's latest assessment of the terrorist threat, including renewed intelligence that HIJACKED AIRCRAFT might be used in an attack. Calls for its release have been resisted. On 4 September the day the new blueprint for action against al-Qa'ida was approved Mr Clarke wrote to Ms Rice asking how she would feel if hundreds of Americans were killed in a terrorist attack. A week later, the Eastern seaboard was attacked. ..."