SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sully- who wrote (127546)3/28/2004 4:12:15 AM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Well, I think I am being consistent when I don't fault Clinton or Bush for not being omniscient nor omnicompetent.

The intelligence people fielding the "chatter" wade through tens of thousands of rumors and leaks per week. Most of the time, only in retrospect does it become clear what was true.

I don't want to live in a police state, where people can be arrested on the basis of unsubstantiated rumors.

In order to ensure perfect safety from jihad, I suppose we could round up and euthanize all Muslims . . . . would that be sufficient to make Clarke happy, do you suppose? Or should we just put them into prison camps?



To: Sully- who wrote (127546)3/28/2004 11:31:44 AM
From: Rascal  Respond to of 281500
 
There's a lot of that going around in
the political arena these days IMO. Heck, even when they
get caught in their lies, they just spin it - deny it -
ignore it & simply keep telling it.

Wisteria, you have been keeping a secret. When did you catch on to them?

Rascal @IKnewYouCould.com


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News