SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (185971)4/1/2004 9:04:01 PM
From: Alighieri  Respond to of 1578517
 
Everyone missed the signs months before 9/11. Yet Clarke is acting like he knew all along. There is a reason why his criticism is so focused on Rice, and it has everything to do with having an axe-to-grind. That's why Rice is in the news much more these days than before. You'd think with all the coverage she is getting, she is the one most responsible for the lapses in intelligence.

Meanwhile, Clarke can't keep his story straight, and his criticisms of the Bush administration keep getting wackier by the day. Last week it was "At least Clinton did something about Al Qaeda." Now it's "Star Wars caused 9/11."


Now, that's bonkers...you can lead a thirsty man to water, but you can't make him drink but his own spit.

Al



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (185971)4/1/2004 10:33:39 PM
From: Road Walker  Respond to of 1578517
 
Ten,

re: because it makes for a much more interesting political story than, say, Kerry's continued anti-Bush diatribes

I must have missed those. On the other hand, I'm bombarded every evening by a half dozen Bush attack ads that are total lies about Kerry's voting record.

O'Neil and Clarke were Bush guys, part of his "loyal" admin. So is the guy that was forced to lie about the cost of the drug benefit. You can deceive yourself to fit your dogma or you can deal with the truth.

What is it, truth or neocon talk show dogma? Imagine that you are a person of intellectual integrity.

John



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (185971)4/2/2004 12:27:35 AM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578517
 
Everyone missed the signs months before 9/11. Yet Clarke is acting like he knew all along. There is a reason why his criticism is so focused on Rice, and it has everything to do with having an axe-to-grind. That's why Rice is in the news much more these days than before. You'd think with all the coverage she is getting, she is the one most responsible for the lapses in intelligence.

Rice is in the news so much because she refused to testify based on a non existent principle that is horsesh*t. This positioning by the Bush administration was a political blunder..........seemingly every one knows it but you. Its something they could have gotten away with two years ago but not now. Americans are making them accountable now and they don't like it.

ted



To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (185971)4/2/2004 1:30:00 AM
From: Amy J  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578517
 
Tenchusatsu, RE: "You'd think with all the coverage she is getting, she is the one most responsible for the lapses in intelligence."

Bush is gifted with letting others take the fall for him.

He has a reputation for using people, then tossing them out after they protect him from his issue.

Regards,
Amy J