Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (37897)	4/5/2004 11:53:54 AM
From: Sully-	Respond to of 793964

"That explains how you can dismiss a dictionary definition, the ultimate authority, while asserting that I'm the one ignoring facts. " Interesting.... I didn't nuance a single thing, but rather, I got right to the point concisely & accurately. Actually, what I did say (and have said previously) is that is what you & many others have done precisely what you perceive I have done. While you may on occasion appropriately nuance some things, too often you claim to be nuancing things when you have gone far beyond subtle differences...... "I have no problems when folks use nuance properly. Examining or debating slight but subtle differences, is to nuance them. Distorting facts, reality, revising history or debating significant differences is not nuance - never was - never will be in my book. However, I see nuance used all too often in this inappropriate manner on the political landscape, including here." Message 19987211