Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: SI Dave who wrote (282903)	4/5/2004 10:09:01 AM
From: Bid Buster	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

"If they had contained their "outside the TOU" behavior to CFZ" I find it interesting that you banned them ON the CFZ.. Your true colors are showing Dave

To: SI Dave who wrote (282903)	4/5/2004 10:17:11 AM
From: Jane4IceCream	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

Geez, pretty lame stuff compared to the political threads here on SI. Jane

To: SI Dave who wrote (282903)	4/5/2004 10:37:54 AM
From: zonder	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 436258

Don't I get a reply, too? I asked nicely. Message 19988922 Please do tell - Are direct personal attacks really grounds for banning SI members? While waiting for your reply on this administrative issue, I noticed that you were busy posting on option expenses on another economics thread. And another question popped into my mind: Just out of curiousity, are you on the staff here (with duties and responsibilities) or are you a client (passing time debating on clients' threads)?