Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Trumptown who wrote (282924)	4/5/2004 11:20:09 AM
From: Jane4IceCream	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

Heck, maybe SI should have parental control. Jane

To: Trumptown who wrote (282924)	4/5/2004 11:25:47 AM
From: Lucretius	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 436258

yep. what's worse about this is that dave threw the first stone and violated TOU with a personal attack. dave butted into the conversation here: Message 19983977 laura responded on topic: Message 19985849 box then box posted this to laura: Message 19985860 is that an attack? doesn't sound like it to me. dave then took the first shot with this post: Message 19986008 which clearly is a personal attack. he called him "clueless." everything that got nasty came after that. how can anyone claim that dave didn't start this??? since when does SI admin have free reign to attack anybody they want and then boot them when they retaliate? a pretty clear setup. this booting was obviously personally motivated and had nothing to do with violating TOU.