Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sig who wrote (128783)	4/9/2004 12:50:45 AM
From: bela_ghoulashi	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 281500

Absolutely. After the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor, we didn't sit around trying to figure out how to keep ships from sinking. We started sinking their ships instead.

To: Sig who wrote (128783)	4/9/2004 1:16:22 AM
From: Zeuspaul	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

Thats all true but costs money and causes inconvienience, complaints and delays. Now after the Spanish train problems we can do the same with trains, busses, and cruise ships. We shouldn't have waited....with Rice's views it makes sense however...don't do anything without specific info about an attack. The terrorists aren't stupid even if we think they are. I can hear Rice now...well they used airplanes last time...who would have thought they would shift to trains?? And let's not do anything about the oil problem until we have long lines and our economy is collapsing...oh yea..I forgot...we had long lines before so we need something more drastic. Long lines at the soup kitchens might work. So far track um down and kill um has only produced more...any more ideas?