Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: zonkie who wrote (13908)	4/11/2004 8:48:36 AM
From: rrufff	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

There's a lot to argue about in your post, but not my reason for posting on this thread. I really am looking for reasons to vote FOR someone.

To: zonkie who wrote (13908)	4/11/2004 9:17:21 AM
From: lorne	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 81568

zonkie. You said...." He went after Bin Laden which any president would have done under the circumstances but then he all but quit when the job wasn't half finished "..... Gees I didn't know that. I thought that special forces were still on the bin lidin hunt. And just how would all of the USA military be used in the hunt for bin lodin. I mean you seem to imply that the troops that were sent into Iraq could have been better used in the hunt for bin laden. Would troops be deployed in all countries in that region.? Seems to me that getting Pakistan on side in the hunt for al kida was a very successful move by Bush plus the many other countries in that region that are on side...but will NOT allow US forces on their soil. So how exactly did Bush just about give up in the hunt for bin stupid?