Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (38987)	4/11/2004 2:42:19 PM
From: LindyBill	Respond to of 793884

Matt Margolis Blog There's No "Gotchya!" For Newsday's Pinkerton By Matt Margolis James Pinkteron wrote a piece for Newsday where he leads with the following question: If you knew that President Franklin D. Roosevelt had received a memo a month before Pearl Harbor entitled, “Japanese Determined to Attack the United States in the Pacific,” and that he had done nothing about that information, would that knowledge change your perception of FDR as a wise war leader? This question frames the rest of his column with the idea that this is a very damning comparison. Now, FDR didn’t receive any memo, but the implication Pinkerton is trying make is not equal. From the made up title of the hypotheticla FDR PDB, “Japanese Determined to Attack the United States in the Pacific,” one would only come to the conclusion, based our knowledge of the history of WWII, that such a memo would be implying Pearl Harbor specifically, or at the very least, imply a more specific threat than the August 6, 2001 PDB had suggested. As Captain Ed at Blogs For Bush describes the Augst 6, 2001 PDB: …no planes flying into buildings, just a suggestion that bin Laden may have planned a hijacking to free Omar abd al-Rahman, who currently resides in a federal prison for the first World Trade Center bombing. It describes 70 “ongoing” FBI investigations related to bin Laden. What in God’s name in this report gave any specific warning that coordinated hijackings would turn planes into guided missiles? Nothing. There is absolutely nothing in this PDB that could have prevented 9/11, and Ben-Veniste and Kerrey knew it – because they had already read it. Why did Ben-Veniste and Kerrey demand its declassification? Because they thought they wouldn’t get it, and wanted to suggest that the Bush administration was covering up something. 9-11 has been referred to as our generations Pearl Harbor. Knowing this, Pinkerton is obviously trying to suggest that the memo’s contents imply a threat with the same specificity as is implied in the hypothetical FDR PDB, “Japanese Determined to Attack the United States in the Pacific.” I find it intersting Pinkerton didn’t use the title “Japanese Determined to Attack the United States” to make his point. The recently declassified PDB was not titled “Bin Laden Determined to Strike The United States in New York and Washington D.C.” or some other variation of equivalent specificity. Pinkerton, has framed the content of the PDB memo with his own biases, and immediate gives the readers an unequal hypothetical scenario in order to imply to readers that Pearl Harbor couldn’t have been prevented, but 9-11 could have, solely from the content of the August 6, 2001 PDB memo. Of course, reading the memo by itself paints a very different picture than the one Pinkerton gives his readers. Not that I’m suggesting Pinkerton is biased or anything…

To: LindyBill who wrote (38987)	4/11/2004 8:08:05 PM
From: JohnM	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 793884

My take: The United States performs remarkably well when it harnesses status and approbational incentives in the right direction. We have done this for business entrepreneurship, but we are not close when it comes to education. When it comes to economics, we have to move away from our near-exclusive emphasis on monetary incentives. Bill, I can tell whether this is your take or Tyler Cowen's. Whomsoever's it is, however, it's simply not a realistic way to address the issue. We have put so little money, energy, imagination, dedication into education in the urban ghettoes of this country for the past, well, it's actually hard to say how long, that improving the status of the education profession is not addressing the problem.