SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: rrufff who wrote (14091)4/12/2004 9:48:30 AM
From: ChinuSFORead Replies (1) | Respond to of 81568
 
There are thousands of warnings every day. Do you put 100 agents on each one? That's 100,000 agents at a minimum for each day's warnings. It's a needle in a haystack.

My friend, this is a no brainer. When you are warned about an impending attack, you increase your guard similar to what the US is doing today. Do you agree that we are doing much better today as far as security goes that what Bush did after his August 6 PDB. People are not saying he should have put 100000 people out there. Tighten up airport security, have more patrols on the bridges, have skypatrils are some of the things I am suggesting and I am not even a terrorism expert. I bet if you ask a terrorism expert like Richard Clarke, he or she will give you a lot of other and even better idesa. But surely not sleep over it and say :it is not important and historical in nature" as Dr. Rice did.



To: rrufff who wrote (14091)4/12/2004 10:56:02 AM
From: cnyndwllrRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 81568
 
If it turned out that they knew they were going to fly planes into the wtcenter, they'd have said they didn't know the day. If it turned out they knew the day, they'd have said they didn't know the flight. If it turned out they knew the flight, they'd have said they didn't know the hijackers. At that point would you finally begin to think that they knew enough to have done a whole lot more to find out more, or do you truly believe that effective protection of the American people means that unless they confess their plans far enough ahead of time so that you know every detail, you're not responsible for stopping them?



To: rrufff who wrote (14091)4/12/2004 12:33:11 PM
From: American SpiritRead Replies (3) | Respond to of 81568
 
Rice has been lying since Day 1, ever since she said there was no way anyone could have known hijackers would use planes as weapons. That there was nothing they could have done to stop 9-11. That there was no warning.

Hey pal, I know you like her but the lady is a BS artist. AT the very least she should have warned the airports and had the FBI sweep for possible terrorists in the country.