SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (39185)4/13/2004 10:16:52 AM
From: Rollcast...  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793912
 
You can't have it both ways.

Actually I can.

1)AQ was responsible for 9/11 and we have engaged militant Islamism and elements of AQ in Iraq...

2)Ted Kennedy/Robert Byrd/Kerry et al are responsible for encouraging attacks on American soldiers in Iraq with their "Vietnam/Sadr a legitimate voice" comments.

When I said... "So anxious to score political points they forget about the American lives they are costing." I was not referring to blame for the actual event but the zeal to blast Bush for the event (or anything else for that matter) causing them to lose sight of the current circumstance our soldiers are in.

There was no flip in my statement (btw, I never claimed to be anything but partisan - only that politics will never take priority over American lives for me).

The flip has been with Dem leadership... "we stand united" to "Bush knew".

Of course, the professor hasn't flipped either - he is just as partisan as he has always been.



To: Lane3 who wrote (39185)4/13/2004 10:30:07 AM
From: Rollcast...  Respond to of 793912
 
ANother foreign endorsement for Kerry...

In the other house on Monday, Ahmed is more eloquent on how the fighting can end and peace can come to Iraq.

“God willing Bush will fall down by the hands of Fallujah,” he says, combining military and political rhetoric. “If John Kerry wins the election and withdraws the Americans troops from Iraq, and maybe just leaves a few in bases, then we will not fight. But Bush we will always fight.”


upi.com



To: Lane3 who wrote (39185)4/13/2004 2:07:27 PM
From: Sully-  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793912
 
"You can't have it both ways. Either al Qaeda is solely to blame, period."

Actually the partisan attacks from the left are well known
throughout the terrorist world. It helps embolden the
terrorists. IOW, the left is aiding & abetting the enemy
with their purely partisan attacks against the Bush
Admin's war on terror.

Additionally, many on the left are not actively helping in
the war on terror. Indeed much of what they do is actively
obstructing it. So instead of having their valuable
assistance in winning the war on terror, these people are
hampering it, plus other resources are forced to deal with
those who are actively hampering it.

You can spin & deny that this is the reality today, but
that is precisely what we face right now. Too many on the
liberal left are placing their desire to recapture the
White House above national security & their 'by any means
necessary' approach is a genuine harm to the cause.



To: Lane3 who wrote (39185)4/13/2004 2:45:08 PM
From: Sully-  Respond to of 793912
 
War and Politics

The American Thinker
April 13th, 2004

Fallujah, Iraq – Marine corporal John Smith from Peoria, Illinois is hunkering down behind a bullet- riddled wall as he grips his weapon and listens to the spine-chilling sound of bombs exploding nearby. He peers through a crack in the concrete to keep an eye on the smoke-filled street and watches for approaching gunmen. Moments ago, his buddy, Tom Jones, a marine from Yonkers, New York, was killed by sniper fire from the rooftop of a building about 50 yards away. Corporal Smith looks over at the lifeless form of the young man he met just a few days ago. He wipes away a tear as he thinks about the lost opportunity to cultivate that friendship.



Washington, DC – Members of the 9/11 Commission are asking questions of National Security Adviser, Condoleeza Rice. Commissioner Robert Kerrey: “Dr. Rice, I’m terribly worried that the military tactics in Iraq are going to do a number of things and they’re all bad.” Kerrey received a smattering of applause from the audience.



Another Commission member, Thomas Kean: “Dr. Rice, can you tell us where, in the early days after 9/11, the administration placed Iraq in the strategy for responding to the attack?” Dr. Rice: “I think, given our hostile relationship with Iraq at the time, this is, after all, a place that tried to assassinate an American president, was still shooting at our planes in the no-fly zone, as well as other hostile actions, it was a reasonable question to ask whether, indeed, Iraq might have been behind this.



Fallujah, Iraq – Masked gunmen are running through the streets killing American civilian workers and US soldiers. Thomas Hamill, an American who works for a US contractor in Iraq, was kidnapped. His captors threatened to kill him and burn his body unless US troops ended their assault on the city. The “assault” they refer to is the action taken by the military to end the brutal insurgency that murdered and mutilated the bodies of 4 American civilians a week ago. Meanwhile, at least a dozen more US soldiers were killed in sporadic street fighting in the former stronghold of Saddam Hussein.



Boston, Massachusetts – Presumed Democratic nominee for president, John Kerry, said today that President Bush’s Policy in Iraq is “arrogant, inept, reckless, and ideological.” <font size=4>Kerry did not make any derogatory statements about the Iraqi snipers, kidnappers, mutilators, or those who soak human bodies in gasoline and set them afire. Furthermore, Kerry, one of the senators who voted for the war, said the administration's handling of developments in Iraq represents "one of the greatest failures of diplomacy and failures of judgment that I have seen in all the time that I've been in public life."<font size=3>



I have the deepest respect and admiration for the soldiers and civilians who continue to risk their lives to bring freedom to a country that has been forced to live with murder, rape, and torture on their streets and in their homes.


<font size=4>
Conversely, I have nothing but contempt for those who would engage in politics that undermine the troops and risk further loss of life on the battlefield. Surely they are aware that their disparaging comments are not lost on the rifleman who draws a bead on one of our soldiers. When they criticize the war, they put a target on the back of every man and woman in uniform.



What really angers me is that they know their denunciation aids and abets the enemy, yet they continue.<font size=3> Additionally, the carping against the war for liberation of an oppressed country is coming from some of the most liberal politicians in the country. Since when did liberals embrace dictatorships? Weren’t they the ones railing against the Patriot Act, which they alleged gave our government too much power, even though it’s being used to defend us against further attacks?


<font size=4>
The leftist establishment in this country has spent more time assailing John Ashcroft than Saddam Hussein, or any of the bloodthirsty group of insurgent leaders in Iraq, all of whom are committed to killing Americans.<font size=3> The relatives of those Americans are watching and listening as they pray for the safety of their loved ones. <font size=4>Is it too much to ask that the Democrats not use those valiant soldiers as pawns in their politically expedient chess game?<font size=3> Perhaps they need to make up their minds whether they are for or against tyranny. In the final analysis, that is the only question.



Bob Weir writes the syndicated column "Weir Only Human." He’s published 7 books, mostly novels, and is a retired sergeant from the NYPD, currently living, and writing, in Flower Mound, Texas. BobWeir777@aol.com

americanthinker.com