SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: microhoogle! who wrote (563946)4/13/2004 2:09:47 PM
From: sea_biscuit  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667
 
A week ago, it was sure that at least one American -- Bremer -- will leave Iraq. Now I wonder if Bremer is sure of even that!

What a disgusting mess! There is a pile of dung in the center of the room and Dumbya's supporters are salivating and savoring its fragrance! Disgusting!



To: microhoogle! who wrote (563946)4/13/2004 2:16:36 PM
From: Skywatcher  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769667
 
Senator Robert Byrd Calls for an Exit Door from Iraq
t r u t h o u t | Statement

Thursday 08 April 2004

Senator Byrd, a senior member of the Senate Armed Services Committee,
delivered the following speech in the Senate calling for an exit strategy for
American servicemen and women in Iraq. Byrd, a vocal critic of the Bush
Administration's policies in Iraq, believes that a massive influx of troops would
not bring peace to the region, but instead would exacerbate the tensions there.

I have watched with heavy heart and mounting dread as the ever-precarious battle to bring security to
post-war Iraq has taken a desperate turn for the worse in recent days and hours. Along with so many
Americans, I have been shaken by the hellish carnage in Fallujah and the violent uprisings in Baghdad
and elsewhere. The pictures have been the stuff of nightmares, with bodies charred beyond recognition
and dragged through the streets of cheering citizens. And in the face of such daunting images and
ominous developments, I have wondered anew at the President's stubborn refusal to admit mistakes or
express any misgivings over America's unwarranted intervention in Iraq.

During the past weekend, the death toll among America's military personnel in Iraq topped 600 --
including as many as 20 American soldiers killed in one three-day period of fierce fighting. Many of the
dead, most perhaps, were mere youngsters, just starting out on the great adventure of life. But before
they could realize their dreams, they were called into battle by their Commander in Chief, a battle that
we now know was predicated on faulty intelligence and wildly exaggerated claims of looming danger.

As I watch events unfold in Iraq, I cannot help but be reminded of another battle at another place and
another time that hurtled more than 600 soldiers into the maws of death because of a foolish decision
on the part of their commander. The occasion was the Battle of Balaclava on October 25, 1864, during
the Crimean War, a battle that was immortalized by Alfred, Lord Tennyson, in his poem, "The Charge
of the Light Brigade."

"Forward, the Light Brigade!"
Was there a man dismay'd?
Not tho' the soldier knew
Someone had blunder'd:
Their's not to make reply,
Their's not to reason why,
Their's but to do and die:
Into the valley of Death
Rode the six hundred.

Tennyson got it right -- someone had blundered. It is time we faced up to the fact that this President
and his administration blundered as well when they took the nation into war with Iraq without
compelling reason, without broad international or even regional support, and without a plan for dealing
with the enormous post-war security and reconstruction challenges posed by Iraq. And it is our
soldiers, our own 600 and more, who are paying the price for that blunder.

In the run up to the war, the President and his advisers assured the American people that we would
be greeted as liberators in Iraq. For a brief moment, that outcome seemed possible. One year ago this
week, on April 9, 2003, the mood in many corners of the nation was euphoric as Americans witnessed
the fall of Baghdad and the jubilant toppling of a massive statue of Saddam Hussein. Less than four
weeks later, the President jetted out to an aircraft carrier parked off the coast of California to cockily
declare to the world the end of major combat operations in Iraq.

For those with tunnel vision, the view from Iraq looked rosy then -- Baghdad had fallen, Saddam
Hussein was on the run, and U.S. military deaths had been kept to a relatively modest number, a total
of 138 from the beginning of combat operations through May 1.

But the war in Iraq was not destined to follow the script of some idealized cowboy movie of President
Bush's youth, where the good guys ride off into a rose-tinted sunset, all strife settled and all
wrongdoing avenged. The war in Iraq is real, and as any soldier can tell you, reality is messy and
bloody and scary. Nobody rides off into the sunset for fear that the setting sun will blind them to the
presence of the enemies around them.

And so the fighting continues in Iraq, long past the end of major combat operations, and the
casualties have continued to mount. As of today, more than 600 military personnel have been killed in
Iraq and more than 3,000 wounded.

Now, after a year of continued strife in Iraq, comes word that the commander of forces in the region is
seeking options to increase the number of U.S. troops on the ground if necessary. Surely I am not the
only one who hears echoes of Vietnam in this development. Surely, the Administration recognizes that
increasing the U.S. troop presence in Iraq will only suck us deeper into the maelstrom of violence that
has become the hallmark of that unfortunate country. Starkly put, at this juncture, more U.S. forces in
Iraq equates more U.S. targets in Iraq.

Again, Tennyson's words bespeak a cautionary tale for the present:

Cannon to right of them,
Cannon to left of them,
Cannon in front of them
Volley'd and thunder'd;
Storm'd at with shot and shell,
Boldly they rode and well,
Into the jaws of Death,
Into the mouth of Hell
Rode the six hundred.

Like Tennyson's Light Brigade, American's military personnel have proved their mettle in Iraq. In the
face of a relentless and seemingly ubiquitous insurgency, they have performed with courage and
resolve. They have followed the orders of their Commander in Chief, regardless of the cost. But surely
some must wonder why it is American forces that are still shouldering the vast majority of the burden
in Iraq, one year after the liberation of the country. Where are the Iraqis? What has happened to our
much vaunted plans to train and equip the Iraqi police and the Iraqi military to relieve the burden on
U.S. military personnel? Could it be that our expectations exceeded our ability to develop these
forces? Could it be that, once again, the United States underestimated the difficulty of winning the
peace in Iraq?

Since this war began, America has poured $121 billion into Iraq for the military and for reconstruction.
But this money cannot buy security. It cannot buy peace. $121 billion later, and just 2,324 of the
78,224 Iraqi police are "fully qualified," according to the Pentagon. Nearly 60,000 of those same police
officers have had no formal training -- none! It is no wonder that security has proved so elusive. The
time has come for a new approach in Iraq.

The harsh reality is this: one year after the fall of Baghdad, the United States should not be casting
about for a formula to bring additional U.S. troops to Iraq. We should instead be working toward an exit
strategy. The fact that the President has alienated friend and foe alike by his arrogance in "going it
alone" in Iraq and has made the task of internationalizing post-war Iraq an enormously difficult burden
should not deter our resolve.

Pouring more U.S. troops into Iraq is not the path to extricate ourselves from that country. We need
the support and the endorsement of both the United Nations and Iraq's neighbors to truly
internationalize the Iraq occupation and take U.S. soldiers out of the cross-hairs of angry Iraqis.

And from the flood of disturbing dispatches from Iraq, it is clear that many Iraqis, both Sunni and
Shiite, are seething under the yoke of the American occupation. The recent violent uprising by
followers of a radical Shiite cleric is by far the most troubling development in Iraq in months and could
signal America's worst nightmare -- a civil war in Iraq that pits moderate Shiites against radical Shiites.
Layered over the persistent insurgency being waged by disgruntled Iraqi Sunnis and radical Islamic
operatives, a Shiite civil war could be the event that topples Iraq from instability into utter chaos.

As worrisome as these developments are in and of themselves, the fact that they are occurring as the
United States hurtles toward a June 30 deadline to turn Iraq over to an interim Iraqi government -- a
government that has yet to be identified, established, or vetted -- adds an element of desperation to the
situation.

Where should we look for leadership? To this Congress? To this Senate? This Senate, the foundation
of the Republic, has been unwilling to take a hard look at the chaos in Iraq. Senators have once again
been cowed into silence and support, not because the policy is right, but because the blood of our
soldiers and thousands of innocents is on our hands. Questions that ought to be stated loudly in this
chamber are instead whispered in the halls. Those few Senators with the courage to stand up and
speak out are challenged as unpatriotic and charged with sowing seeds of terrorism. It has been
suggested that any who dare to question the President are no better than the terrorists themselves.
Such are the suggestions of those who would rather not face the truth.

This Republic was founded in part because of the arrogance of a king who expected his subjects to
do as they were told, without question, without hesitation. Our forefathers overthrew that tyrant and
adopted a system of government where dissent is not only important, but it is also mandatory.
Questioning flawed leadership is a requirement of this government. Failing to question, failing to speak
out, is failing the legacy of the Founding Fathers.

When speaking of Iraq, the President maintains that his resolve is firm, and indeed the stakes for him
are enormous. But the stakes are also enormous for the men and women who are serving in Iraq, and
who are waiting and praying for the day that they will be able to return home to their families, their
ranks painfully diminished but their mission fulfilled with honor and dignity. The President sent these
men and women into Iraq, and it is his responsibility to develop a strategy to extricate them from that
troubled country before their losses become intolerable.

It is staggeringly clear that the Administration did not understand the consequences of invading Iraq a
year ago, and it is staggeringly clear that the Administration has no effective plan to cope with the
aftermath of the war and the functional collapse of Iraq. It is time -- past time -- for the President to
remedy that omission and to level with the American people about the magnitude of mistakes made
and lessons learned. America needs a roadmap out of Iraq, one that is orderly and astute, else more of
our men and women in uniform will follow the fate of Tennyson's doomed Light Brigade.

CC