Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (39255)	4/13/2004 4:05:37 PM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793917

Yup, you simply swept it under the rug as though it wasn't any different than..... "You might just as well pick out equipment failures or intelligence failures or any one of a number of unfortunate decisions. Singling out the one you do is not logical." Message 20017865 The blatant partisanship from the left is far more serious than "equipment failures". You don't see foreign terrorists & Arab media jumping all over "equipment failures" as a reason to continue their jihad. They are all over every partisan attack, every outrageous lie the liberal left tells against the Bush Admin to show the bitter split in the US to show our weakness & to exploit it. Terrorists would much rather we fight among ourselves than focus on eliminating them. They know full well that if we stood together fully resolved to defeat the terrorists, they'd be in serious trouble. The partisan lies & deceit that splits America is one of the best weapons they have going for them right now. You can spin it any way you wish, but this is the hard reality of what is actually going on. Blatant partisanship is among the most serious of the problems we face in the war on terrorism & every partisan attack does aid & abet the enemy.

To: Lane3 who wrote (39255)	4/13/2004 6:14:02 PM
From: Rollcast...	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793917

Rollcast blamed the partisan attacks from the left for American casualties. Where? especially in a post where he explicitly denied any blame for Bush, Where? So, perhaps you'd care to go back and reread the transaction between Rollcast and me and then revise your comments to make them more appropriate to what was I actually posted. You first. Also, please be sure to bold that lecture about sanctimony you gave. Zat better? Nope, pretty much as factually inconsistent and conveniently forgetful as most libs.