Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Impeach George W. Bush -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (26131)	4/16/2004 11:41:01 AM
From: jttmab	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93284

But mr. bill spent how many hours during the working day planning how many hours of time he would not be disturbed while he masturbated in the face of interns. I give up...how many? [That's a two part question.] ...interns Plural! You're a fountain of knowledge! How many were there? What were there names? jttmab

To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (26131)	4/16/2004 11:54:01 AM
From: KipferlMeister	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93284

One can only conclude the prospect of sex keeps your own mind riveted to the exclusion of any other thought for hours ahead of time. But hey, if it takes that much planning and concentration for you, so be it ...whatever works.

To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (26131)	4/16/2004 12:44:23 PM
From: X Y Zebra	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93284

i am going to assume you are genuine in your post. -one chance- (unlike clear examples by others, who all they do is make idiotic charges without proof, rendering any communication impossible.) first. understand this once & for all. i am not a clinton supporter. (other than the fact that his indiscretion helped uncover the zeal of those identified representatives with ties to the christian coalition), from that perspective and for me, the net result of what clinton did in THAT particular instance, is a positive. and i may add, by their own doing. now... that does NOT mean i am a clinton supporter. in fact my post is quite clear in putting down using clinton as a 'comparable standard' in spite of my early cautious optimism about bush, the results have been disappointing. there are a number of issues that could have been dealt differently. in many i disagree and here is where the problem starts with those cheerleaders who consider any dissent, an automatic qualification to be called 'the enemy' (and a lot more.) for example: If you are too stupid to see how mr. bill's self gratification addiction with the assistance of interns did not compromise his time thinking about his oath to protect and serve, well your post shows you such an idiot why would anyone expect you to comprehend. where do you see that in my post? unless you are simply getting your instant gratification by making it up and insult me. if that is the case, then forget it, you and i do not need to waste more time.