SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: 2MAR$ who wrote (17102)4/19/2004 1:20:11 AM
From: Scott Bergquist  Respond to of 28931
 
"It’s something about skeptical biblical scholars who do not give the benefit of the doubt to New Testament writers. And I don’t know what that is. It’s a disease or something."

Instead of hazarding a guess, he throws out an emotional "fishing lure">> "It's a disease of something."

I believe there is something much more specific involved here, and this person DOES know what that is. Perhaps he should contact an accredited "minimalist" scholar to find out why New Testament writers don't fit with other ancient historians.



To: 2MAR$ who wrote (17102)4/19/2004 1:52:33 AM
From: Greg or e  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 28931
 
I find it somewhat strange that you will not afford my views the same level "tolerance" that you demand of me toward yours. Why is that?

BTW... I don't have any problem accepting 1st or Second Peter as the God-breathed word of God. However for the purpose of the discussions here I was focusing on the earliest and universally recognized writings by Paul and Luke.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News