Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Don Earl who wrote (6038)	4/20/2004 3:38:04 AM
From: GUSTAVE JAEGER	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20039

Re: Considering both hits on the WTC were caught on tape,... LOL... You mean like Bin Laden "caught on tape" urging jihad, praising the alleged Arab hijackers, trashing America, and lately, offering Europe a truce??? You mean "caught on tape" like Colin Powell's evidence of Iraq's WMD caught on satellite pictures? Remember: they were all "CIA-authenticated" tapes... And when Powell fast-talked the UN Security Council into passing res 1441, DCI Tenet sat and nodded next to him... Bottom line: those pictures and footages of airplanes hitting the WTC ARE NO EVIDENCE. Of course, that's hard to admit... since it means that there is no "free media" --the media, the press, the networks are all at the beck and call of the powers that be, they are part and parcel of the media-military complex. As for "There are things you can do with missiles and high explosives, but sticking 30 tons of fuel on a missile smaller than the space shuttle or making high explosives create huge orange fireballs are not on the list", suffice it to assume that the crew of "plumbers" who planted the mininukes at the WTC basement were all the more able to fit up the floors allegedly hit by the hijacked airliners. It shouldn't be that difficult for explosives specialists to stage a missile strike against a tower... and there was enough room in WTC offices to stow them with barrels of kerosene. What they were unable to do, however, is to squeeze Boeing engines or fuselage debris into the offices!! Hence the need to collapse the whole boodle.... Gus

To: Don Earl who wrote (6038)	4/20/2004 6:34:22 AM
From: GUSTAVE JAEGER	Respond to of 20039

One last thing... re: While the Pentagon hit is less well documented, there was airplane debris all over the place. That bit of crap was debunked a long time ago: Message 19838155 As for "Likewise, there was airplane debris all over the place from flight 93", that poses no problem: US authorities successfully turned the shootdown of flight 93 into a Hollywood-like fray between the passengers and the hijackers.... Actually, I suspect that the debris of flight 93 were allowed to crop up because the bombing of the State Dept flopped --remember the blacked out news about an explosion at the State Dept on Sept. 11, 2001???? Which could also elucidate the collapsing of WTC-7: in a flash of panic, the 911 conspirators were ready to blow up about anything to make their figures add up: four airplanes shot down called for FOUR crashes! I guess that asking FBI/NSA fixers to whip up yet another fake video/footage of an airplane smashing WTC-7 was deemed "far-fetched"... Hence the fallback coverup of a passenger mutiny. Gus