Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: russwinter who wrote (12276)	4/20/2004 5:04:00 PM
From: gregor_us	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 110194

Well Then Bring it On! My Wife and I Are Holding Cash, ...having lingered on the sidelines of the housing market for 2 years. If A.G. is a Nutter, if he and his Fed friends use poor models and basically just pull answers out of their asses--while at the same time blending all of that shoddy work in with myriad corrupt influences...then I say, bring it on. There are some single-family and two family sellers in my town who have really reached for the stars in their asking prices, having bought and held since the early to mid-1990's. Smack em! I'm here waiting!

To: russwinter who wrote (12276)	4/20/2004 6:37:56 PM
From: NOW	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 110194

well, your #2 proves the project did work...when have insiders ever been given such an opportunity to unload crap on the masses???? when?

To: russwinter who wrote (12276)	4/20/2004 10:23:57 PM
From: gregor_us	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 110194

I Remember When the Minutes Emerged from The Fed Meetings of 1998/1999, during their rate hike cycle. There had been much discussion through this period nationally about raising margin requirements and A.G. was even questioned about this publically--but he sort of dismissed it as any solution to Irrational Exuberance. Said it wasn't effective. Said it was unimportant. But that's not what he said privately, as revealed by the minutes. I mean A.G. knew the whole friggin' history of Margin Requirements for the prior 90 years, and had a long detailed discussion about them in the meetings with other Fed people and acknowledged that raising them "would certainly do the trick..." I remember when this disparity emerged. Some took notice but of course the time lag between meetings and printed minutes is just over the heads of people, for some reason. And I thought..."man, this guy is a little odd." I should have thought more of it. When Bush was elected, my father who had spent his career watching interest rates--and had watched A.G.'s career--then spent most of the first 6 months of Bush's Term with his mouth hanging open in disbelief at what was coming our of A.G.'s mouth. "Has he gone completely mad---is this really Alan Greenspan?" This is pretty much what I heard from my father every week. After 36 months of Reflationary Policy--I'm reflecting now on the possibility that A.G., rather than being "flexible" simply cannot make up his mind. He has been so damn consistent since January of 2001--I at least thought he understood his own plan, regardless of what anyone else thought of it. But now I'm not so sure. A.G. may be like a bad/novice trader who stays in a losing position forever--then finally acts at the bottom. The position started out with so much conviction, so much theory--with such clarity. At the bottom though is a touch of panic, and remorse. Did Alan Greenspan sell out of his own position today?