Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (187015)	4/24/2004 3:19:38 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576642

No. For the inverse, how about you? Yes. War is risky business, and there is the possibility that the outcome will not be good. This was true in Grenada just as it is now in Iraq. It is, after all, war. That said, intelligent people don't think about the war in the context you've presented it. WAR ALWAYS LOOKS HORRIBLE WHEN YOU'RE IN THE MIDST OF IT. Using your formula, we would never be able to finish one; it would always be necessary to bail out before the job is finished. (YOU MAY HAVE HEARD IT BEFORE, "WHEN THE GOING GETS TOUGH THE TOUGH GET GOING"? THEY WERE TALKING ABOUT WAR). Bush's approach to this war was sensible before it began, and that is the true test. Unless you're willing to say to Al Qaeda, "We fought, you won, we surrender", leaving Iraq today would be the wrong thing to do. I'm not willing, and fortunately, the vast majority of Americans (and Iraqis) see it the same way.