SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: American Spirit who wrote (17930)4/26/2004 12:26:25 AM
From: Thomas A WatsonRespond to of 81568
 
PROOF: John forbes kerry, the #1 liar in the media.

LOL John forbes kerry did throw back his metal before he did throw back his medals... LOL..........

_ __ _____ ____ ____ __ __ _ ____ _ ___ _____
| |/ / | ____| | _ \ | _ \ \ \ / / ( ) / ___| | | |_ _| | ____|
| ' / | _| | |_) | | |_) | \ V / |/ \___ \ | | | | | _|
| . \ | |___ | _ < | _ < | | ___) | | |___ | | | |___
|_|\_\ |_____| |_| \_\ |_| \_\ |_| |____/ |_____| |___| |_____|

blog.johnkerry.com
RIGHTWING FICTION: It was dishonorable for John Kerry to give back the military ribbons he had been awarded.

FACT: Quite the opposite. John Kerry returned his ribbons as a symbolic gesture to make the point that the Vietnam war had to end. At the time, Kerry said, "I am not doing this for any violent reasons, but for peace and justice, and to try to make this country wake up once and for all." He also returned the medals of a WWII veteran and a Vietnam veteran who asked Kerry to return their medals. Kerry and the other veterans held the ceremony to keep more young American men from dying because of President Nixon's failed policies. The Nixon Administration made John Kerry one of its targets and Kerry's rightwing foes have been smearing his name and his service ever since. [Tour of Duty, Douglas Brinkley

_____ _ _ _____ _____ ____ _ _ _____ _ _
|_ _| | | | | | ____| |_ _| | _ \ | | | | |_ _| | | | |
| | | |_| | | _| | | | |_) | | | | | | | | |_| |
| | | _ | | |___ | | | _ < | |_| | | | | _ |
|_| |_| |_| |_____| |_| |_| \_\ \___/ |_| |_| |_|

Discarded Decorations
Videotape Contradicts John Kerry's Own Statements Over Vietnam Medals
By Brian Ross and Chris Vlasto
ABCNEWS.com

April 25— Contradicting his statements as a candidate for president, Sen. John Kerry claimed in a 1971 television interview that he threw away as many as nine of his combat medals to protest the war in Vietnam.

"I gave back, I can't remember, 6, 7, 8, 9 medals," Kerry said in an interview on a Washington, D.C. news program on WRC-TV's called Viewpoints on November 6, 1971, according to a tape obtained by ABCNEWS.

Throughout his presidential campaign, Kerry has denied that he threw away any of his 11 medals during an anti-war protest in April, 1971.

His campaign Web site calls it a "right wing fiction" and a smear. And in an interview with ABCNEWS' Peter Jennings last December, he said it was a "myth."

But Kerry told a much different story on Viewpoints. Asked about the anti-war veterans who threw their medals away, Kerry said "they decided to give them back to their country."

Kerry was asked if he gave back the Bronze Star, Silver Star and three Purple Hearts he was awarded for combat duty as a Navy lieutenant in Vietnam. "Well, and above that, [I] gave back the others," he said.

The statement directly contradicts Kerry's most recent claims on the disputed subject to the Los Angeles Times last Friday. "I never ever implied that I did it, " Kerry told the newspaper, responding to the question of whether he threw away his medals in protest.

"I'm proud of my medals. I always was proud of them," he told Jennings in December, adding that he had only thrown away his "ribbons" and the medals of two other veterans who could not attend the protest.

Flip Flop?

The disputed incident happened 33 years ago this past weekend, on April 23, 1971, when Kerry led the group Vietnam Veterans Against the War in a protest against the war they fought.

Many veterans were seen throwing their medals and ribbons over the fence in front of the U.S. Capitol. At the time, The Boston Globe and other newspapers reported that Kerry was among these veterans.

"In a real sense, this administration forced us to return our medals because beyond the perversion of the war, these leaders themselves denied us the integrity those symbols supposedly gave our lives," Kerry said the following day.

But in 1984, when he first ran for the U.S. Senate, Kerry revealed he still had his medals. According to a Boston Globe report on April 15, 1984, union officials had expressed uneasiness with Kerry's candidacy because he had thrown his medals away. Kerry acknowledged the medals he threw away were, in fact, another soldier's medals. He reportedly invited a union official home to personally inspect his Silver Star, Bronze Star and three purple hearts, awarded for his combat duty as a Navy lieutenant.

In the 1971 Viewpoints interview, he made no mention of the ribbons or the medals belonging to another veteran.

And in 1988, Kerry again clarified his statement by saying he threw out ribbons he had been awarded for three combat wounds, but not his medals. "I was proud of my personal service and remain so," he told the National Journal.

Eight years later in 1996, Kerry said while he did throw out his ribbons, he didn't throw out his own medals because he "didn't have time to go home [to New York] and get them," he told The Boston Globe.

Kerry's campaign Web site says he "is proud of the work he did to end the war. The Nixon Administration made John Kerry one of its targets and Republicans have been smearing him ever since. John Kerry threw his ribbons and the medals of two veterans who could not attend the event, and said, 'I am not doing this for any violent reasons, but for peace and justice, and to try to make this country wake up once and for all.'"

A spokesperson for Kerry's campaign said he didn't make a distinction between medals and ribbons, but Kerry plans to respond on Good Morning America.

abcnews.go.com



To: American Spirit who wrote (17930)4/26/2004 9:05:21 AM
From: Glenn PetersenRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 81568
 
Just in case you didn't get the memo last night, feel free to drop the Bush from "Cheney-Bush" this week.

Democrats to Target Cheney

Attacks on Vice President Aimed at Eroding Confidence in Bush


washingtonpost.com

By Mike Allen and Jim VandeHei
Washington Post Staff Writers
Monday, April 26, 2004; Page A04

Sen. John F. Kerry (D-Mass.) and the Democratic Party will open a week-long assault on Vice President Cheney today in hopes that tarring him as promoting secrecy and controversial policies will erode confidence in President Bush.

Cheney is less popular than Bush in polls, and Democratic strategists said they need to further inhibit the vice president's effectiveness as Bush's attack messenger.

Cheney is expected to deliver a major address in Missouri today charging that Kerry's record shows he would be unsuitable to serve as commander in chief in an era that requires an unwavering leader who can recognize gathering threats and is willing to speak out against them, even when that is difficult or unpopular. Aides said Cheney will say the president must set a clear and consistent foreign policy, and support a military strong enough to use decisive power as a last resort.

Kerry's campaign said he will focus first on Cheney's record as defense secretary under President George H.W. Bush, charging that Cheney proposed cuts to weapons critical to recent military operations. Bush's campaign replied that Cheney took his stands during the peace-dividend rollback of the military after the Soviet Union collapsed.

On Wednesday, Kerry is to turn to White House efforts to prevent disclosure of records of an energy-policy task force led by Cheney. On Friday, Kerry plans to highlight Cheney's connections to the Halliburton Co., a major U.S. contractor in Iraq.

Bush aides said they considered it a victory to have Kerry campaigning against Cheney instead of Bush and talking about national security.

Bush's campaign today will begin a heavy run of ads charging that Kerry "has repeatedly opposed weapons vital to winning the war on terror." For the first time, the campaign is customizing ads for specific swing states to highlight locally made systems or components Kerry has opposed. The campaign is also staging a two-week "Winning the War on Terror Tour," in which Republican officials and decorated veterans will appear at plants that make weapons Kerry has opposed.

The Republican National Committee is also urging lawmakers to tell constituents about a position paper from Kerry's first Senate campaign, in 1984, in which he called for $45 billion to $53 billion in cuts to President Ronald Reagan's defense budget, saying there is "no excuse for casting even one for unnecessary weapons of destruction." Kerry told the Boston Globe in 1993 that some of those positions were "ill-advised, and I think some of them are stupid in the context of the world we find ourselves in right now and the things that I've learned since then."

Kerry is targeting the vice president during the week that Bush and Cheney are scheduled to appear together for private questioning by the independent panel investigating the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

Ninety minutes before Cheney's speech in Missouri, Democratic National Committee Chairman Terence R. McAuliffe is to give a speech in Washington accusing Bush's campaign of trying "to smear John Kerry's service to America."

"Why should we believe a word Dick Cheney says about John Kerry?" McAuliffe's remarks state. "For four years, Dick Cheney hasn't been straight with the American people."

Cheney's role as Bush's attack dog highlights one of the many reasons some Democrats are prodding Kerry to choose a running mate quickly: It would give him a prominent surrogate to hammer away at the president. The use of McAuliffe to respond to Cheney is notable because some of Kerry's advisers have said McAuliffe is seen as too partisan and bombastic.

Yesterday, Kerry launched a week-long bus tour of the industrial Midwest to criticize Bush for jobs lost under the president's watch, and to highlight new employment-creating proposals -- from tax breaks for manufacturers to spreading new technologies such as broadband Internet access.

Bush is to speak about such technologies today in Minnesota, where he plans to announce what the White House calls "innovation economy" policies.

Over the next five days, Kerry will roll through Ohio, Pennsylvania, West Virginia and Michigan, states with two distinguishing characteristics: They have lost manufacturing jobs and are considered pivotal swing states for November.

At the Veterans Memorial Auditorium in Des Moines yesterday, Kerry stuck to his standard speech, save for a brief poke at the Bush administration for declining to show photos of coffins sent back from Iraq with the bodies of soldiers. "We should not hide that from Americans," Kerry said. "If they are good enough to go fight and die, they are good enough to be received home with full honors."

Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa), who endorsed Howard Dean during the primaries, made a not-so-subtle vice presidential plug for Tom Vilsack, the state's governor. Vilsack is one of more than half a dozen Democrats under consideration.

Harkin reminded the audience that President Franklin D. Roosevelt, in troubled times, turned to an Iowan for his running mate: Henry Agard Wallace in 1940.

VandeHei reported from Des Moines.