Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MKTBUZZ who wrote (570032)	4/28/2004 5:56:10 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Respond to of 769667

spookie and ermie the germie should be the poster excluded.

To: MKTBUZZ who wrote (570032)	4/28/2004 6:05:04 PM
From: microhoogle!	Respond to of 769667

Go for it. It doesn't hurt :-) as long as people are within bounds of TOU

To: MKTBUZZ who wrote (570032)	4/28/2004 6:12:03 PM
From: Bill	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

Why don't you publish the list of banned posters before opening the jail doors. I suspect there are a couple who should remain on life sentences...

To: MKTBUZZ who wrote (570032)	4/28/2004 6:19:22 PM
From: GROUND ZERO™	Respond to of 769667

If it ain't broke, don't try to fix it... why the sudden amnesty? Didn't you ban them for a reason? What makes you think they rehabilitated? You may end up banning them again... if you must release them, then how about a zero tolerance policy... one screw up and they're gone... but I would vote, keep them out... GZ

To: MKTBUZZ who wrote (570032)	4/28/2004 7:03:09 PM
From: Gordon A. Langston	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769667

Yes, making it a strict rule about the number of posts in a time period. Two weeks off if it's violated. The rule is 20 messages in six hours. Those that tend to over do it will not likely be able to hold back so you WILL have something to do.;)......sorry..

To: MKTBUZZ who wrote (570032)	4/28/2004 7:36:10 PM
From: ManyMoose	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

First I'll respond, then I'll see what the other five so far have said. I thought this thread WAS unmoderated, and that nobody was banned except for violating SI rules (like soliciting, such as that committed by a certain unnamed individual whose initials are _D). It's pretty much of a free for all already. Keep it like it is. It's much more interesting than the John Kerry thread. Nobody over there but democrats.