Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (131242)	5/3/2004 10:54:24 PM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

No dice....those at Guantanamo were taken by and large from the battlefield where they were engaged in trying to kill US troops and our allies ......that ain't no concentration camp Bubba.... JLA

To: Maurice Winn who wrote (131242)	5/4/2004 12:14:41 AM
From: ManyMoose	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

You analogy is fallacious. Dachau contained people who were imprisoned only because of the racial paranoia of the Nazis. There's simply no point in imprisoning non-terrorists. Those guys are very bad guys, in case you have forgotten. Call it whatever you want, the terrorists at Guantanamo are there for a valid reason and will eventually receive justice. If that means some of them get out, they get out. The rest? Now just why was it you care? People who might be Islamic Jihad threats are imprisoned because if they are released, they might act against the USA. That's just what was done in Dachau and under much more trying circumstances for Germany,