Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (131392)	5/4/2004 2:26:13 PM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

or Carl is misrepresenting me......... He does that a lot. But he lives in an alternate reality, where the war never happened, so you can't expect him to be in touch with the reality the rest of us live in.

To: Neocon who wrote (131392)	5/4/2004 4:45:59 PM
From: Sam	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 281500

Please note that I didn't use your name, I said "[fill in the blank....]". The reason I did that was that I really didn't know if you had posted all of those things or not, but surely you must agree that all of those things were posted by numerous people either here on this thread on articles, op ed pieces, speeches, interviews, etc. People have been claiming that Carl's predictions are not to be trusted because he didn't think Bush would be stupid enough to invade Iraq. But he has been proven right about many more things than that, and many of the same people who complain about him being "wrong" that once made at least some of (and at times, many of) the predictions he listed. Personally I think Carl is still indulging in wishful thinking if he thinks Bush is leaving Iraq if he wins this election. But that just means that he doesn't read Bush very well; he understands guerilla warfare and occupations better than anyone else on this thread, IMO. Including me.