Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Moderate Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: epicure who wrote (10005)	5/4/2004 2:54:44 PM
From: Dale Baker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20773

I take a NIMBY stance; if other threads want to be littered with garbage, they can ask for the "privilege". But I like to see SI Admin cleaning up the neighborhood I live in. I am not a fan of rigid gated communities with 23,467 rules. But I don't like anarchy either. Plenty of that elsewhere on SI already. JMHO.

To: epicure who wrote (10005)	5/4/2004 3:44:54 PM
From: cosmicforce	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20773

Since SI Admin declared you and I the same person, I've not been myself or you.

To: epicure who wrote (10005)	5/4/2004 5:00:33 PM
From: SI Dave	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20773

If and when thread moderators take ownership of enforcing the TOU on their threads (as is done on iHub), that will be a good thing, as I'm sure almost everyone will agree. > It makes much more sense to discipline on threads that are unmoderated... That's really quite ironic, since someone invariably complains that unmoderated threads should be left alone by the admin whenever one intercedes. I don't understand where they got that notion anymore that where others get the notion that moderated threads should be off limits.