Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Orcastraiter who wrote (6414)	5/4/2004 2:25:44 PM
From: mph	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 90947

I haven't called Kerry a war criminal. If anything, he called himself a war criminal by virtue of his own testimony and later commentary. I merely reacted to the fact that Kerry evidently didn't figure out that there was some problem with his actions until he decided to be a proponent of the anti-war movement. Whatever is expedient, as usual. I think your concerns about an investigation should be directed elsewhere.

To: Orcastraiter who wrote (6414)	5/4/2004 3:24:52 PM
From: Alan Smithee	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 90947

You dissemble. I never said Kerry was a war criminal. What I said was that Kerry himself admitted to engaging in atrocities. "Hence, Kerry could be prosecuted for war crimes (or even for his failure to notify senior officers of the commission of those war crimes)." My original post on this topic: Message 20088592 Perhaps it would have been better to say, "Hence, Kerry could be investigated for war crimes and if probable cause existed to charge, to be prosecuted for war crimes." Not sure how you take my comments and say that I said Kerry is a war criminal.