SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Maurice Winn who wrote (42847)5/8/2004 2:21:29 AM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 793731
 
The military intelligence people who came up with that system perhaps know what they are doing, but I suspect that they don't. Maybe for people they know are guilty of something, or who are confirmed enemies, it might make some sense, but even then I doubt it.

For neutral people scooped off the street, they'd make instant and passionate enemies


Do we have any knowledge of the proportion of groups in Abu Ghraib? If you learned that the people had been sorted out and were Al Qaeda or high-ranking Ba'athists, would it alter your opinion? If 90% of were, what then? 80%?

Questioning suspected terrorists is unlikely to be pretty and nice, even when done by experienced, non-sadistic, disciplined interrogators. They are trying to break the spirit of fanatical jihadis in order to prevent the next suicide bomber.



To: Maurice Winn who wrote (42847)5/8/2004 3:55:36 AM
From: LindyBill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793731
 
For neutral people scooped off the street, they'd make instant and passionate enemies.

The ones being interrogated are bad, bad, boys who hate us anyway. It is amazing how much they will talk if handled right.