Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ilaine who wrote (42949)	5/8/2004 10:04:45 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793738

If these particular prisoners actually had information and were being tortured in order to get that information, it might be worth talking about, but that's not the case Obviously we're not talking about a rogue interrogation unit working with any kind of disciple. Such a unit might have tortured prisoners but wouldn't be moronic enough to pass around snapshots. It sounds like we are talking about a rogue interrogation unit without disciple. However, that doens't answer the question of whether the prisoners were chosen at random for abuse, or because they were discipline problems, or because it was thought they had information.