Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jttmab who wrote (132270)	5/8/2004 11:28:51 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

You have a copy, at a minimum, of information that is harmful to the US. Remember no exceptions and we go by the "rule of law" in this country. I do? Quick!!!.. I need Sheryl Crow to come over and strip-search me!!! NOW!!! ;0) Because it's been disclosed by the press does not mean it's been declassified. Unless you can come up with a memo officially declassifying the Taguba report, your machine is now classified Secret/Noforn. Congratulations! Actually, that would be the case, were the report on my machine.. But it's not.. However, does this apply to MSNBC's server (where I found the copy online)?? But overall, it's nice to know you finally understand the law.. It's a law.. but even if a law exists, it comes down to prosecutorial discretion whether it will be enforced or not.. I merely stated that the law exists and there is a penalty, should the government CHOOSE to prosecute. Your first amendment right to free speech takes precedent, unless you waive it. Twenty or so years ago you could collect a bunch of paper and put a classified cover on it [no paragraph markings required] that's no longer allowed. Hold one.. your right to free speech ends when it violates my civil rights. It's been long ruled that your right to free speech can be limited when it threatens the welfare of others (such as yelling fire in a crowded theater). I would at least agree that whoever had that report and released it to someone that was not authorized to receive it is subject to prosecution. If you'd just bothered to admit this in the first place, we BOTH could have same a considerable number of words over this... Btw, thanks for the freezer full of ducks!! Hawk