SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: rrufff who wrote (573262)5/8/2004 11:31:34 PM
From: CYBERKEN  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
Kerry's a throwaway-but so were the rest of the dwarfs.

Make a long post and explain how YOU would have devised an occupation of Iraq.

Remember though, that:

This re-colonization has been 95% successful so far-other than in the MARGINAL area of anti-American propaganda (and in that, the jury's still out, simply because you haven't SEEN the 80% Bush landslide in November. America is universally PISSED at the slimy Democrats and their poster boy, John Kerry.)

The "prisoner issue" is a left wing media and Democrat traitor propaganda angle, and is of absolutely NO historical significance.

The 5% of this re-colonization that has been incorrect pays back in spades (no, not Al Sharpton), because we will be REPEATING these occupations throughout the Middle East and most of the subhuman Islamic world for at least the next 20 years.

Alternate history? I have killed a few tens of millions more subhuman Islamics if I had been in charge. That day will come. There is NO "good" Islam...



To: rrufff who wrote (573262)5/8/2004 11:42:02 PM
From: CYBERKEN  Respond to of 769670
 
<<His negative ratings have gone up higher than Bush's which is amazing considering the way the past few weeks have gone.>>

It's not really amazing, if you have been watching American politics carefully since 1963, as I have. I would refer you especially to 1968 (The massive and highly visible failure of the Johnson administration in both war and domestic policy), 1972 (the Silent Majority's huge reaction to the LAST overt traitor that the Democrat domestic enemy tried to run for president), and 1980 (as well as the 1994 off-year elections: exposing the total inaccuracy of public pollsters when they run to their America-hating left wing ROOTS, and start pumping out polls they would LIKE to see, as they are in 2004.)

That just scratches the surface of 40 years of our complicated American political history. Study it carefully, and you will see that my favorite jab that Kerry will need a miracle to get to double digits is hardly a pie-in-the-sky prediction at all.

If John Kerry still had 10 million votes to lose by last Thursday, he lost them Friday, as his Senate Democrat pals engaged in the greatest orgy of treason in the post Civil War era...



To: rrufff who wrote (573262)5/9/2004 5:58:31 AM
From: JDN  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
Your post makes me feel you may be a "fence sitter" at this point so I am going to give you my thinking on your comments regarding all the negative P/R. That is this:
IMHO NEARLY ALL the media have chosen in their leftist zeal to ONLY accentuate the NEGATIVE and to OMIT the POSITIVE. They are attempting to swing this election to Kerry which in many informed peoples mind would be an absolute DISASTER for the USA and its future. Why they are doing this is beyond me.
Saturday I saw the FIRST and ONLY personal interview of the escaped captive truck driver. When asked how he felt about Iraq, he replied he and his fellow contract workers absolutely support President Bush and what he is attempting to accomplish in Iraq. This was on Fox, you think that comment will be picked up by anyone else? You believe in the tooth fairy? jdn



To: rrufff who wrote (573262)5/9/2004 10:17:34 AM
From: Kenneth E. Phillipps  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 769670
 
attack mode? What are you referring to? Kerry has not been attacking Bush. The attacks ads have come from Bush. What have you been watching?