Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Robert Douglas who wrote (177928)	5/11/2004 3:22:10 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Reich was not my favorite from the Clinton economic team but in comparison to Elaine Chao, he's brilliant. BTW from briefing: 7:16AM Investors should not get too excited about the recent labor report given last Friday - NY Post : The New York Post discusses Friday's labor report and suggests that investors should not get too excited about all those new jobs that were supposed to have been created in April. According to the article, the bottom line is that most of the 288K jobs that the Labor Department says were created last month may not really exist and they could be figments of statisticians' optimism. Back in the March employment report, the government added 153K positions to its revised total of 337K new jobs because it thought (but couldn't prove) loads of new co's were being created in this economy. That estimate comes from the Labor Department's "birth/death model." As staggering as the assumption about new co's was in March, the Labor Department got even more brazen in April as it was disclosed that these imaginary jobs had been increased by 117K to 270K for the latest month. Without those extra 117K make-believe jobs, the total growth for April would have been just 171K, which is sub-par for an economy that's supposed to be growing at more than 4% a year.