Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: greenspirit who wrote (44629)	5/15/2004 4:23:27 PM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793903

Abuse exposes media hypocrisy Jonathan Gurwitz: SAN ANTONIO DAYS AFTER THE SEPT. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, the major TV networks decided to stop airing images of the planes striking the World Trade Center and of the towers collapsing. On Sept. 11 itself, a decision was made not to broadcast images of the 200 or so people forced to jump to their deaths. These images were judged were too disturbing, the American psyche too fragile, and the fear of retribution against innocent Muslim-Americans and calls for revenge against the terrorists' enablers too great for us to see the evidence of that fateful day. Compare this paternalism with the media's treatment of the photos of prisoner abuse at Abu Ghraib. These images have headlined every major newspaper and led every national newscast for more than a week, to say nothing of the international media. The knowledge that even more graphic images exist has created a frenzy of journalists swarming to get their hands on the latest evidence of American perfidy in Iraq. News executives who suppressed the Sept. 11 images evidently lack similar concerns about the Arab psyche, retribution against Americans, or calls for revenge against U.S. interests. Pointing out this disparity in no way mitigates the dastardly acts at Abu Ghraib. The treatment there of Iraqi prisoners by Americans was despicable. Nothing can excuse it, and every American leader from the president on down has condemned it. Moreover, we expect our society to hold its members to a higher standard of conduct, and we subject them to greater criticism than do societies in the Mideast and the Third World. Nor is it necessarily an argument against publication of the images seen thus, or of more to come. As Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said last week, in testimony before Congress, reading reports of abuse is one thing; seeing photographs of it sparks outrage. Acknowledging this disparity does, however, reveal something about the motivations of those in the media who practice this double standard. Abu Ghraib is the realization of an anti-American fantasy, the embodiment of "the Ugly American" in the post-modern age. Its images are a montage of every perceived vice of American society, and every grievance against it. Islamic fundamentalists see the emancipation of women, homosexuality and sexual decadence taken to its logical -- American -- end. Arab and Third World nationalists see evidence of American imperialism. Multiculturalists see proof that American society is no better than the societies that globalization and the spread of democracy threaten to supplant. Anti-war activists revel in a digital My Lai -- a final reckoning of decades-old indictments of the American military. When all the images have been broadcast, when all this American self-flagellation is complete, perhaps the media will finally show us the Americans tortured by flames and forced to leap 100 stories to their death. Perhaps they'll give us the images of the other incomprehensible crimes that have occurred in the Mideast in the two weeks since the Abu Ghraib photos emerged: Of Tali Hatuel, an Israeli woman eight months pregnant who was murdered by a Palestinian terrorist, along with her four daughters, aged 2 to 11. Of Nuran Halitogullari, a 14-year-old Turkish girl strangled to death by her father and brother to salvage their family's honor after she had been raped. Of the naked body of an American dragged through Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, behind a car driven by Islamic extremists, who had killed him. Of the decapitation of American civilian Nick Berg in Iraq. Of the 1 million African refugees from Darfur, Sudan, facing starvation, rape and murder by government troops and government-supported Arab militias. Perhaps Abu Ghraib has set a new standard for candor and societal introspection around the world. Perhaps the media will report unblinkingly the other, far worse atrocities. Perhaps -- but don't count on it. Jonathan Gurwitz is a columnist for The San Antonio Express-News.