Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (45976)	5/20/2004 11:42:17 PM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 794197

How do you know Abu Ghraib has nothing to do with Al Qaeda? I assume that the various nasty annoying defense attorneys who are defending the various guards in the various courts martial would raise that as a defense.

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (45976)	5/21/2004 8:54:54 AM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 794197

I find it interesting that not one story, not one! has even thought it worthwhile to enquire who the abused prisoners were. You have mentioned this before and I have seconded it before. Very odd. I also thought it odd that the administration so meekly backed off on their methods. The only inference I can draw from that combination of events is that the prisoners in question were nobody know-nothings who could not be justified as warranting more strenuous treatment. I would like to see it covered directly, though.