SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (133960)5/22/2004 8:09:12 PM
From: Ish  Respond to of 281500
 
<<it certainly was abusive, but it normally takes more than that to qualify as "torture" - except when the word is being redefined and expanded to make the US look bad.>>

Being forced to masterbate vs boiling water enemas that Saddam was passing out. I know which one I'd pick.



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (133960)5/22/2004 8:19:03 PM
From: dumbmoney  Respond to of 281500
 
There is a persistent effort to redefine English words in the service of the enemies of the US effort.

It's all about the pictures. The words don't mean a thing.

The pictures of Americans abusing/torturing Iraqis are what will be remembered long after this is all over.



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (133960)5/22/2004 8:19:05 PM
From: Dr. Id  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
This is similar to the deal about the dead contractors in Fallujah who were derided as "mercenaries" to make it look more like they had it coming. There is a persistent effort to redefine English words in the service of the enemies of the US effort.

So what were those "contractors" in Fallujah, Nadine? Were they paid soldiers? Who is "redefining English words"? When it was described what their role was, they sounded like mercenaries to me...



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (133960)5/22/2004 8:19:37 PM
From: Lou Weed  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
<<There is a persistent effort to redefine English words in the service of the enemies of the US effort.>>

C'mon Nadine......out of curiosity, what treatment does it take to qualify as torture and not "abusive"? Is anal rape on your list or is that just abusive?



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (133960)5/22/2004 9:24:19 PM
From: blue red  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Does murder qualify as torture in your book? Stomping on hands and feet? Giving shocks with live wires? Anal rape of children?