Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Don Earl who wrote (6866)	6/3/2004 3:47:34 PM
From: sea_urchin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20039

Don > someone outside the planes took control of them before they hit, but I don't know how it could be proven That's exactly the way I feel. And it makes sense, too, for the reason, which you imply, that all aspects of the "attack" would then have been under control and not left to anyone's whim. Here are three links, which I will not precis, which lead one to the opinion that radio control possibilities were definitely present on the involved planes. And they were present for precisely the reason they were needed --- to assume remote control in the event of a hijack. sianews.com chemtrailcentral.com rense.com In the circumstances, apart from the speculation that radio control could have been used to direct the planes into the various buildings, one must ask why the radio control was not used by NORAD to avoid the events which occurred? Indeed, NORAD appears to have been doubly culpable on 9-11: a. For not scrambling interceptors b. For not employing radio control as a means to avoid the disaster.