SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Idea Of The Day -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: IQBAL LATIF who wrote (46394)6/6/2004 3:47:23 AM
From: IQBAL LATIF  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 50167
 
Gen. Zinni on Pakistan —Khalid Hasan

The moral of this tale is that had there been no 9/11, the US would have continued to ignore Musharraf, but what it did not realise was that Gen. Pervez Musharraf, Chief of Army Staff, was born under a lucky star

Gen. Anthony Zinni, who ran the US Central Command at an eventful time in our history, has just published a book, co-authored with novelist Tom Clancy. What it establishes is something that has always been suspected, namely that regardless of the state of relations between Islamabad and Washington, the two armies have always had a one-on-one equation.

Gen. Zinni writes that in 1998 after India carried out its nuclear test, the US was deeply concerned about Pakistan following suit. In an effort to persuade Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif to desist, it was decided to fly a delegation to Islamabad made up of Zinni, Strobe Talbot and Karl Inderfurth. Pakistan, he recalls, was bitter because of US sanctions and the F16 issue. “Our treatment of Pakistan was working against our interest,” he writes. The three men were about to take off from Tampa for the direct 22-hour flight to Islamabad when word reached them that they were not welcome. In desperation, Zinni phoned Gen. Jehangir Karamat, whom he calls a “man of great honour and integrity, and a friend.”

“Relations with Pakistan hung on a thin thread of a personal relationship that Gen. Karamat and I agreed to maintain,” he writes. Karamat “promised to take care of the problem and a few minutes later we were in the air”. This means that the army chief had overridden the decision of the prime minister. The delegation met several times with Sharif and his ministers but was unable to convince them.

At his last private meeting with Karamat, the Pakistani COAS shared with him “his frustration with his corrupt government”. Karamat also assured him that though his military colleagues had urged him to take over, he could “never do it”. Zinni’s next reference to Pakistan takes him to April 1999 when he went there to meet the new army chief, Gen. Pervez Musharraf, whom he found “bright, sincere and personable ... a fervent nationalist who leaned toward the West”. Zinni recalls that Musharraf was “as appalled as Gen. Karamat over the ever-worsening corruption within the civilian government”. He says “we both agreed to stay in close touch”. They also exchanged home phone numbers, thus forming a “friendship” that would prove to be “enormously valuable to our two countries”.

Then came the conflict with India where “the Pakistanis waylaid the Indians and penetrated all the way to Kargil” threatening Indian communications and support up to Siachin. The Indians came back “with a vengeance” and the situation began to worsen, bringing the two countries to the brink of war. Zinni was asked to rush to Pakistan and make it withdraw from Kargil. Zinni held meetings in Islamabad on June 24 and 25 and told his hosts, “If you don’t pull back, you are going to bring war and nuclear annihilation down to your country. That’s going to be very bad news for everybody.” He writes that no one quarreled with his “rationale” but no one wanted to “lose face”. Withdrawal to the LoC was seen as “political suicide”, so a face-saving device was found in the form of a meeting with President Clinton, but only after a “withdrawal of forces”. Zinni writes, “That got Musharraf’s attention; and he encouraged Prime Minister Sharif to hear me out.”

In other words, the man who had brought about Kargil was prepared to back down. Sharif, Zinni adds, was “reluctant to withdraw before the meeting with Clinton was announced, but after I insisted, he finally came around and he ordered the withdrawal. We set up a meeting (with Clinton) in July”. Does anyone remember that Musharraf came to see Sharif off at the airport. Zinni’s account reveals that the army pulled out of Kargil willingly and not because of Sharif. In fact, if there was any resistance to pull back, it was on the part of the prime minister not the army chief who later made many heroic claims about Kargil, accusing Sharif of “surrender”.

Washington did not like the Musharraf coup and told the Pentagon to scale down contact with Rawalpindi. It was Musharraf who called Zinni and told him what had led to the coup and why “he and other military leaders had no choice other than the one they took”. He told Zinni that in Pakistan democracy was a sham as everything the government controlled was “up for sale”. He said he wanted a democracy, not of form but substance (I suppose that is what we have four years later). Though Zinni tried to talk his superiors into resuming contacts with the new government in Islamabad, they were not convinced.

In December 1999, Zinni was asked to call Musharraf and ask him to arrest certain terrorists whose cohorts had been picked up in Jordan. Musharraf obliged, but when Zinni asked the administration to “reconnect” with Musharraf, he was refused. Zinni called Musharraf and gave him the bad news. Musharraf answered, “I don’t want or expect anything for what I’ve done. Tony, I did it because it was the right thing to do.”

The moral of this tale is that had there been no 9/11, the US would have continued to ignore Musharraf, but what it did not realise was that Gen. Pervez Musharraf, Chief of Army Staff, was born under a lucky star.



To: IQBAL LATIF who wrote (46394)6/6/2004 5:23:34 AM
From: IQBAL LATIF  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 50167
 
Madakhel is a small village in North Waziristan, the Afghan borders runs three to four km away, it in inaccessible to the outside world even dirt tracks are non existent, from Miran shah the 40 km journey to Madakhel can take four hours although since 2002 some work is going on and semi hard tracks have appeared. The rationale of its aloofness from the world is the oath in late 1800’s on holy book Quran taken by Madakhel elders and Wazeri tribes to keep their region out of the influence of colonialists who were considered as infidels. No education infrastructure existed until 2002, since 2002 with the help of US aid new primary schools and health centers are appearing and new roads are being constructed, in a population of 40,000 in close proximity the number of graduates is less than 10.

Practically everyone has ammunition that is ample to fight many a wars, In Afghan struggle against USSR used these areas became the storage ground for Jihadi equipment, according to local sources the armaments the modern one flourished as nearly three big ship loads every month were to be distributed to the freedom fighters inside Afghanistan to fight the reds, of course the conduits was fully funded and supplied by the US government policy under tutelage of CIA a man known as Brigadier Yussuf from ISI ran the war with billions of dollar supports of US government and a support that was unstinted the logic was ‘green of Islam is better than red of the Communists’ that was the time when lunatics of the world likes of Osama were gathered and hounded nearly 40,000 of them armed with latest weaponry like stingers and put in Afghanistan.. They had the free territory, they had the modern weaponry and they had the savage mind and a ideological goal to destroy the infidel red in a name of Allah, the combination of all these elements resulted into fall of USSR, a body blow in Afghanistan was something that Brezhnev could not recover from the divisions in the politburo due to heavy looses and occupation of Afghanistan resulted in speedy demise of USSR and fall of the iron curtain overnight from Europe, the sagas of Russian tanks running through Rhine and the great war games to stop the Russian through German Ruhr and nightmares of breach of Fulda gap were all found to be over preparation, the third world war won and ensuing peace dividend helped the global economy.<reflect on the last month of World War II you will recognize that the Wetterau Corridor and what we now know as the Fulda Gap served as the main avenue for the drive of the Third U.S. Army from its Rhine bridgehead near Frankfurt onward to Leipzig and the heart of Germany. In the Cold War Soviet war planners from the Eight Guards Army Staff near Weimar all the way to the Ministry of Defense in Moscow probably had a codename for this avenue in the westbound mode. Anyway, you do not have to be a war planner to look at the map of Germany and recognize that the shortest route from East Germany to the Rhine River was THIS avenue. >

The marriage of Stone Age medieval mind with modern weaponry to bring down the cyber age economy was solemnized in these wretched lands, these lands and beyond became the perfect breeding grounds where a explosive ideological mind met the right geography, terrain people and traditions to plan the fall of the cyber age global economy. These were the sanctuaries totally inaccessible to the outside worlds, totally forgotten once the war was won and peace dividend utilized for the benefit of mankind but out their there were dogs of war looking for new action.

The amassing of new weapons and dreadful one too, new firepower has led to new aggressions, the balance of terror earlier was based on ability of the local tribal authority ‘Jirga’ to raise a 303 armed ‘lashkar’ against an outlaw today that ability has been greatly diminished, the local Maliks feel under armed when die hard ex talebeni like Nek Mohammed take to the mountains in a direct defiance to traditional authority and use mortars and heavy weaponry a sad remnants of the Russian occupation resistance of Afghanistan.

The tribal area is a free land and is governed by its own writ, the Brits rarely ever tried to bring the land under their total writ, they developed a loose control of system that still exits, the free roaming pakhtuns would not accept a iota of change and subservience of their independence to any authority outside their known systems. The system works on the prehistoric system of collective responsibility and hence since system primary configuration is primitive and primitive so are the results it has successfully kept the area bound in stone age, mentally as well as physically, once a man is trained only on basic instincts combined with traditions based on settlement of feuds through blood the evolving discipline is based on balance of terror. If a murder happens in geographical confines of tribe the whole tribe is responsible and is meted out collective punishment the ‘sins of father are very much a responsibility of their sons’ it is normal the an outlaw family and a tribe has to produce the outlaw, British created this system of internal control whereby they targeted man of influence and made them the Maliks, they were registered with the British agent of the area called as political agents.

These Maliks were given state benefits and monthly stipends according to their stature the practicality and the ability to control their wards and tribes determined the stipend. It was fixed and calibrated as from 5 Rs. stipend a century ago to 200 Rs. Stipend and more, depending on the ability of the Malik to control the area and number of people this system has evolved where a local Malik is the elder and is responsible for peace in the area, now these very Maliks face a strange task they are deeply ideologically motivated, their code of conduct is Pakhtunwali and ‘nang’ is something that they have been taught to live and die for, many a lands are inaccessible, even many a aborigines and ex-Indians have been put in reservations where inundated by fire water they have lost their will to survive independent of alcoholism, but here is an inhospitable territory that has medieval philosophy ingrained in them as core software and these primitive minds were totally immersed in modern warfare and trained as guerillas.

Intertwine medieval system with most basic living conditions with no facility with every conceivable modern weaponry at their disposal and one can imagine the task that lies ahead for Pakistan to clear this mess.. A land ruled by FCR ,Frontier crime regulations based on stone age logic needs to be brought in this modern age, three things, make roads, make it accessible, make education popular by making it compulsory and provide basic health, give these people hope to survive not as warriors but productive humans, that is the long term objective, since post 911 a lot of aid has been given and a lot is happening to change the courser of minds, it will take time but the hope exists, people their are as human as all of us, it just needs some little more attention, they don’t needs stingers they need basic education, and if we have the indecency to use them as cannon fodder than lets have decency to settle them now.

They did win the 3rd world war, a USSR that felled was primarily due to the hinterland people they now need our help to get rid of the foreign terrorists embedded in them from last three decades but more than that is the development of their social structure, a small sum can change the most explosive of mind combinations in a peered of one decade, we owe this change to our future generations for their peace.



To: IQBAL LATIF who wrote (46394)6/9/2004 10:47:40 AM
From: malibuca  Respond to of 50167
 
'Enlightened Moderation' and Mr. Musharraf's Record

These letters to the editor, in the Washington Post today, on Musharraf’s op-ed about “enlightened moderation” succinctly expresses the reality of the situation in Pakistan. One of the letters appears to be from a Pakistani – based on the name of the individual who states what I have heard repeatedly from those who live in Pakistan – namely, that Musharraf talks a good game but when it comes to action, he falls short every time.

***********************************************************

I agree with Pervez Musharraf [op-ed, June 1] that "the militancy that was sparked in Afghanistan . . . should have been defused after the Cold War," but I respectfully dissent from the assumption that Pakistan's record in allowing it to fester is beyond reproach.

Under Gen. Musharraf's watch, Pakistan was one of only a few countries that accorded diplomatic recognition to the fundamentalist and despotic Taliban regime. The Pakistani government also acquiesced to or condoned the presence of Osama bin Laden and his band of murderers on Afghan soil.

Had Pakistan not supported the Taliban administration and turned a blind eye to al Qaeda training camps in its back yard, the militancy and extremism that Gen. Musharraf now bemoans would not have degenerated to their present dangerous levels.

As the legendary Israeli diplomat Abba Eban put it, "The harsh truth is more salutary than a smooth evasion."

DICKSON ODIBI
Burtonsville

Pervez Musharraf's call for "enlightened moderation" omitted any call for political development or democratic reform.

Apparently the Muslims of Pakistan, at least, will have to pursue "individual achievement" and "socioeconomic emancipation" under a military strongman. How convenient for the general.

RICHARD L. LOBB
Fairfax

Since he came into power in 1999, Pervez Musharraf has expressed his resolve for an enlightened, modern and progressive Pakistan. However, he has consistently failed to follow up on his words.

A case in point is his failure to take action against the Islamic laws that discriminate against women and that were introduced without discussion or debate by the dictator Mohammed Zia ul-Haq.

The average Pakistani will support Gen. Musharraf in his quest for "enlightened The average Pakistani will support Gen. Musharraf in his quest for "enlightened moderation," but he needs to prove that he is willing to walk the walk.

NUZHAT AZIZ
Philadelphia

Pervez Musharraf rightly urged Muslims to band together to counter terrorism while prodding the West to put forward a more compassionate hand of friendship toward Islam.

His statement was especially significant because in the 1990s and even a few years ago his government supported extremist organizations. Gen. Musharraf is on record defending the actions of some of these organizations, such as a Kashmiri freedom struggle receiving "moral support" from Pakistan. Clearly, assassination attempts against him, reportedly by Islamic extremists, have helped turn the corner. I hope Pakistan now will become a true strategic partner in the fight against terrorism.

In the same column, I read between the lines an underlying ambition of the general to take on a grander mantle -- to become the leader of the global Islamic community. Perhaps he would be the ideal emissary to the extremist Islamic minority because of his transformation from someone who oversaw acts of terrorism and nuclear proliferation to someone who champions moderation.

GIRISH RISHI
Rockville

washingtonpost.com