SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (580881)6/6/2004 6:33:08 PM
From: Wayners  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 769670
 
All you Bush haters will like this!

If you add up the name 'George Bush' in Hebrew letters it comes out:

G = 3 (gimel)
e = 5 (heh)
o = 70 (ayin)
r = 200 (resh)
g = 3 (gimel)
e = 5 (heh)
B = 2 (beth)
u = 70 (ayin)
s = 300 (shin)
h = 8 (cheth)
total = 666 (Antichrist)



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (580881)6/6/2004 8:55:44 PM
From: Peter O'Brien  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
90% of the budget was spent on defense during WW2.

Currently, only 20% of the budget is spent on defense.

Where is the "sacrifice" on the non-defense portion
of federal outlays?



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (580881)6/6/2004 9:08:18 PM
From: Peter O'Brien  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
Revenues from individual income taxes as a % of GDP
are roughly the same today as they were during WW2
(about 8% of GDP).

Are you suggesting that we need to be taxed *MORE*
than we were taxed during WW2 to fight the Iraq War?

Also, do you ever stop and think about
why those 90+% top marginal rates during WW2 were
not any more effective at actually raising revenue
(measured as a % of GDP) than today's much lower
top marginal rates?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News