SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : I Will Continue to Continue, to Pretend.... -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sully- who wrote (3049)6/9/2004 8:27:34 AM
From: Andrew N. Cothran  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 35834
 
VOICE OF THE PEOPLE (LETTER)
The generous spirit that is uniquely American

Henry J. Hyde (R-Ill.), Chairman, Committee on International Relations U.S. House of Representatives
Published June 9, 2004

Washington, D.C. -- I am writing in regard to "Pope despairs of America's `soulless' vision; Pontiff warns George, Midwest bishops not to let flock stray amid lure of materialism" (Page 1, May 29). As a practicing Catholic, I revere the Holy Father. In addition to his spiritual guidance, he has been a consistent voice for freedom and was the single greatest force in the defeat of communism.

It, therefore, is painful when the Holy Father, or those who speak for him, fall into the error of depicting America and Americans as having a "soulless vision of the world," one characterized by an excessive materialism and a drift away from our "spiritual roots."

I am not so foolish as to believe that the U.S. is not capable of mistakes and errors of judgment. And it would be hubris to overlook our many failings. Certainly our society's tolerance of abortion and its attendant culture of death is a far more damning indictment than is the pope's most recent criticism.

But these papal remarks, coming as they did near Memorial Day, need to be answered, because, despite my admiring reverence for the Holy Father, he is absolutely wrong in referring to the U.S. as "soulless." The most direct response to this characterization would be to cite the persistent religiosity of Americans, a striking quality repeatedly remarked upon by foreigners throughout our history. The high levels of attendance at formal religious services and the widespread belief in a supreme being are in sharp contrast with Europe, where secularism reigns as an unquestioned ideology and the legacy of Marxist materialism has devastated the spiritual capabilities of half of the continent.

As for our broader culture, any depiction of it as "soulless" can arise only from a profound misperception, given that its exuberance and endless creativity emerge from the "pursuit of happiness" that our founding documents declare to be a God-given right. It is pervaded by a celebration of life, in sharp contrast to the desiccation and frozen tradition that so often characterizes the swaddled cultures of our critics.

Nor should our wealth be equated with materialism. No one is more obsessed with material needs and desires than a hungry man. We have been blessed with enormous wealth, but what is too often overlooked is our unprecedentedly generous sharing of this blessing with others.

It would take several pages of this newspaper to recount even a fraction of the resources that the United States has devoted toward alleviating the world's poverty and disease--resources unparalleled in scale and breadth by any other country or international organization.

But that recounting should not be limited merely to the efforts undertaken by our government. The enormous scale of private philanthropy and the ubiquity of volunteering by individuals throughout our society simply have no parallel in any other country. These are uniquely American. In other countries, the obligations each human owes to his fellow creatures are too often disposed of by shedding these duties to the distant cold sterility of a government program, thereby freeing citizens from the onerous weight of caring for others. Curiously this refusal to burden themselves with a personal responsibility for others is coupled with a self-image of moral superiority and a determination to instruct us and others regarding our duty.

More often than not, our critics in Europe and elsewhere who are so quick to point out our failings, real and imagined, regard themselves as members of an elite class and thus reflexively dismiss what they see as our crude, populist, non-elitist culture. Their characterization is in many ways correct, as our culture was, in fact, created by and for the common man and grants to each individual, no matter how lowly his origin or station, a basic dignity that need not be earned or bestowed by his betters because it is his by right.

The reality is that the United States attracts so much criticism because our ideals are so high, our record so consistently positive, that others eagerly seize upon our inevitable blemishes in an effort to demonstrate that our achievements are but pretensions and that we are, in fact, no different from all the rest. But who expects shining results from Russia, China, France, Brazil, Nigeria, Iran or any other country? Or is surprised by their meager contribution to the world?

The reality is that the standards others set for us, that we set for ourselves, rest in a class by themselves, so gloriously higher than that of any other country. In his heart, I know the Holy Father knows these things, and he has expressed his love for our beloved country many times.

I salute the flag because we remain the strongest, bravest, most compassionate nation that has ever existed. To an extent unparalleled in history, whatever security, happiness and prosperity that exist in the world rest heavily on sacrifices this country has made, sacrifices that include our dear warriors fighting for our country and for nameless others on foreign soil, sacrifices that we do honor to ourselves in remembering.

Copyright © 2004, Chicago Tribune



To: Sully- who wrote (3049)6/10/2004 12:41:45 AM
From: abstract  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 35834
 
thank you.

i'd like to know specifically why i was booted, what to avoid & if i restrict myself to solely posting linked paragraphs from longer articles will i ever be booted for so doing.

have a good trip,
paul



To: Sully- who wrote (3049)6/13/2004 6:45:49 PM
From: abstract  Respond to of 35834
 
Terror inquiry snares art exhibit

FBI seizes material intended for Mass MoCA display on genetically modified food; four artists subpoenaed

By TIMOTHY CAHILL, Staff writer

timesunion.com

First published: Sunday, June 13, 2004

NORTH ADAMS, Mass. -- Visitors to "The Interventionists" exhibit at MASS MoCA are greeted by a sight unusual even for the cutting-edge art museum. One of the galleries in the show devoted to contemporary political art is oddly vacant, dominated by empty tables and a sign explaining that the materials intended for the display have been impounded by the FBI.

The seized materials, including simple bacteria, have become part of a case that some feel is pitting artistic expression against the sweeping anti-terrorism powers of the federal government. In addition to confiscating the makings of the art installation, federal officials have subpoenaed the artists involved in the work and may be pursuing charges of biological terrorism.

The computers, test tubes, laboratory instruments and other supplies not on view were intended for an installation titled "Free Range Grains," part of the exhibition "The Interventionists," on view at MASS MoCA through next spring. The installation, designed to draw attention to genetic modifications in food, was created by Steve Kurtz, a founder of the artist collaborative Critical Art Ensemble. The materials were taken from Kurtz's Buffalo home last month.

Kurtz and three other members of CAE have been ordered to appear before a grand jury in Buffalo on Tuesday.

Kurtz's attorney, Paul J. Cambria Jr., called the proceedings "preposterous" and an assault on the First Amendment.

FBI spokesman Paul Moskal said the investigation, which involved quarantining Kurtz's home and the participation of some three dozen workers in protective clothing, "isn't an art question at all. For us this was a public-safety issue."

Federal authorities became involved on May 11, following the death of Kurtz's wife, Hope, of heart failure. Emergency personnel responding to Kurtz's home noticed the laboratory equipment the University at Buffalo art professor uses in his installations, became suspicious and notified the FBI.

The equipment was to have been used at MASS MoCA to conduct simple experiments on food products to determine if they contained GMOs, genetically modified organisms. Critical Art Ensemble has staged such performative-art installations in this country and Europe to call attention to the proliferation of food-related biotechnology.

According to news reports, the FBI also seized samples of three relatively benign bacteria used to demonstrate the presence of manipulated genes in common food items. Erie County health officials later reported they had tested Kurtz's possessions and found nothing to endanger the public.

The FBI referred the case to U.S. Attorney William J. Hochul Jr., chief of the anti-terrorism unit in western New York. Hochul would not comment on the Kurtz investigation, and no charges have been filed to date.

But reports from individuals interviewed by federal authorities, including other members of CAE served with subpoenas, say the tone of questioning suggests Hochul is attempting to build a case against Kurtz as a bio-terrorist. Beatriz de Costa, a member of the CAE collective, told The New York Times the grand jury is looking into "possession of biological agents."

On the advice of his lawyer Cambria, Kurtz is not available for comment.

Cambria has fought other notorious First Amendment cases, most notably defending Hustler magazine Publisher Larry Flynt in the Supreme Court. "It's dead-bang a First Amendment case," Cambria said of the Kurtz situation. He described Kurtz as "simply an artist with a critical message."

"Trying to make a case that he's really a terrorist is bull," Cambria said. "The country is conditioned for suspicion and paranoia -- 9/11 makes it ripe for the government to find a terrorist under every leaf."

At MASS MoCA, the "Free Range Grains" gallery features the empty lab tables and four posters on the back wall. The posters contain photographs of genetically modified foods captioned with familiar corporate slogans. An image of a tomato, for instance, reads, "We bring good things to life."

At the gallery entrance, a text panel explaining why the installation is incomplete states, in part, "the lab equipment used for 'Free Range Grains' could not be successfully used for the production and weaponization of any germs dangerous to humans or animals."

Gregory Sholette, a volunteer with the Critical Art Ensemble Defense Fund and the author of an essay in the "Interventionist" catalog, said letters of support for Kurtz have been coming in from artists around the country. Speaking of federal investigators, he said, "I think they got their foot stuck in a hole. Instead of pulling it out, they're digging deeper."

He said a demonstration for CAE and artistic freedom is planned for Tuesday at the federal court house in Buffalo.



To: Sully- who wrote (3049)6/13/2004 6:47:31 PM
From: abstract  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 35834
 
Intelligence: The Pentagon—Spying in America?

msnbc.msn.com



To: Sully- who wrote (3049)6/13/2004 11:39:13 PM
From: abstract  Respond to of 35834
 
Senators: CIA stalling on review of Iraq report

'Not a flattering picture,' Intelligence Committee chief says

Sunday, June 13, 2004 Posted: 7:13 PM EDT (2313 GMT)
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Senate Intelligence Committee members are accusing the CIA of hindering the release of a report that gives an unflattering assessment of pre-war intelligence on Iraq.

Committee chairman Pat Roberts, a Kansas Republican, said Sunday that his committee plans to approve the report with "almost unanimous" support this week. But the CIA is still reviewing the document to prevent the release of classified information and intelligence methods.

cnn.com