Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (190147)	6/9/2004 4:49:26 PM
From: Thomas M.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1577123

The main point is not whether Chomsky said they where precise No, that is exactly the point the slanderer was trying to make. rather that Chomsky said that the attacks probably lead to tens of thousands of deaths, when apparently they only directly led to one death, and there is no evidence of any large scale indirect deaths resulting from the attacks. Exactly. Chomsky said there is no evidence, because nobody has bothered to investigate. Estimates run in the tens of thousands. one of Chomsky supposed sources, Human Rights Watch, never claimed what Chomsky said they claimed. Chomsky's words in the phone interview were not clear. His book was clear and perfectly accuarate. Of course, the slanderer pretends that Chomsky has not cleared up this issue. salon.com It's particularly noteworthy that the slanderer analyzes Chomsyk's brief phone interview, instead of the book Chomsky wrote on the topic. That by itself reveals quite a bit about this slanderer. Tom