Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zeuspaul who wrote (136126)	6/9/2004 11:44:55 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

No, we don't agree at all! You said "Do you really believe the Israelis would have allowed Saddam to exist" - as if Israel could have removed Saddam if it chose, as if Israel could have done what the US just sent 140,000 soldiers to do. That's total nonsense.

To: Zeuspaul who wrote (136126)	6/10/2004 2:53:40 AM
From: Hawkmoon	Respond to of 281500

<i<>The issue was about the credibility of intelligence agencies. Hawk seemed to indicate that there was agreement between the intelligence agencies on the planet that Iraq had a large arsenal of WMDs. No.. what I DID say was that intelligence agencies around the world were in agreement that Saddam was in material breach of his disarmament obligations. The 15-0 vote for UNSC 1441 clearly expressed that belief. After all, would the intelligence service of a UNSC member permit its representative to vote that Iraq was in material breach if they had exculpatory evidence to the contrary? Hawk