SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Hawkmoon who wrote (136178)6/10/2004 4:29:34 PM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
If I had known then what we know now, I might not have supported the war against Iraq. No real way to know, we never got the chance to debate the matter as you are framing it now.

As I recall, I was opposed to it until the WMD argument was made. And that was the major thrust of the arguments in favor of the war, that Saddam had WMD and could not be trusted not to pass them on to terrorists.

I trusted the information coming from the NYTimes and the WashPost precisely because they are usually liberal, so assumed they would aggressively check the facts.



To: Hawkmoon who wrote (136178)6/10/2004 6:14:29 PM
From: Win Smith  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
I get it just fine, I always understood the war marketing plan perfectly well. That's not what that article was about, though, except maybe in some looking glass "facts and logic" sense.

I mean, I know we're all supposed to just listen to what W wants us to listen to, and ignore any contrary reporting, but that seems a bit too convenient for the incumbent.