Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KyrosL who wrote (136402)	6/12/2004 4:02:01 PM
From: carranza2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

we would respond with a complete annihilation of any place in Iraq that could conceivably harbor other nuclear weapons. That's wild. I thought I was conservative--your thinking on this issue is remarkable. You essentially propose turning the entire country of Iraq into a parking lot should Saddam use one nuke. I have a lot of trouble in killing off millions of subjugated individuals simply to make a point. Your solution would never be made US policy. Moreover, it doesn't deal with the economic consequences. But to get back to my original point, I think I'm making progress with respect to raising your consciousness as to how dangerous Saddam armed with nukes would have been. As to NKorea, well, it's not in the ME, is it? And the considerations are quite different.