Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mph who wrote (8954)	6/15/2004 2:53:07 PM
From: Orcastraiter	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 90947

Do you disagree that Gore has moved from the center? Regardless of the details of the 2000 election, Gore lost. When Nixon lost he gave his "Checkers speech". No one likes a loser, and Gore acted like a loser, not unlike Nixon once upon a time. But who would have thought that Nixon could become the phoenix rising from the ashes? If this does not make my point about the fickleness of the electorate then nothing will. So too...Gore could rise from the ashes. I'm thinking that Gore was so off put by Bush's unilateralism and the damage he has done to our country, that he was looking to throw his support behind the front runner. At that moment he saw Dean as the best chance to unseat Bush. He prematurely threw his support to Dean. I never thought it was a good move for Gore to support Dean. I think it was Gore's angry reaction to Bush. There's a lot of anger in the country and the world towards Bush. Had the outcome of the prior election not been so hotly contested, and bemoaned by Gore supporters to this very date, you might have a point. There's never been a losing candidate whose supporters have not bemoaned the loss. Get a clue! In a tight and contested race such as 2000, that angst would naturally be amplified. Orca