Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Discuss the candidates honestly. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: nolimitz who wrote (150)	6/16/2004 4:09:30 PM
From: mph	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4965

It sounded like yet another program he wants to fund by rolling back tax cuts on the $200K/year crowd. I would love to see exactly how much that would actually yield and to compare it to each program Kerry has proposed which would be funded by the roll-back. I have a suspicion that the math won't work out. But broad proposals always sound good on the stump<g> I was intrigued by the reference to stay at home moms, though. The whole tenor of the proposal had to do with people who had to work 2-3 jobs just to stay afloat. If a woman is lucky enough to be able to afford staying home with her kids, if she is inclined to do so, I question why working people should subsidize it through programs designed to take the kids off her hands while she goes shopping or attends to other personal matters. While it would be great for anyone, I don't see that as a taxpayer responsibility.........