SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: longnshort who wrote (31414)6/18/2004 4:02:38 PM
From: Lizzie TudorRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 81568
 
Sorry but Clinton had the common sense to get out of the way and project a positive attitude which allowed our economy to grow, as opposed to BushCo, who drove the economy under in a sea of death and deficits.

BushCo's constant wardrum sounding in 02 (when there was NO IMMEDIATE THREAT WHATSOEVER) really was inspiring and caused corps to hire and build, right?

Bush and his lack of economic discipline caused our dollar to crash, foreigners pulled out of our markets, corporate capital in the form of stock valuation was decimated and there went the economy in a giant flush.

Of course the average voter knows this all too well which is why Bush is out. Only 4 more mos of death and spending ala BushCo, thank god.



To: longnshort who wrote (31414)6/18/2004 6:12:47 PM
From: WaynersRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 81568
 
I think the reason for that is based on credit. If people spent evenly, there wouldn't be up and down cycles. Instead people go on spending binges using credit and then savings binges when the money and credit runs out. This in a nutshell is the crux of the business cycle. Without extensive credit, it would tend to even out spending more.